Difference Between » Gadgets http://www.differencebetween.net Difference Between Similar Terms and Objects Tue, 07 Sep 2010 15:51:23 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 en hourly 1 Difference Between PAL Wii and NTSC Wii http://www.differencebetween.net/object/gadgets-object/difference-between-pal-wii-and-ntsc-wii/ http://www.differencebetween.net/object/gadgets-object/difference-between-pal-wii-and-ntsc-wii/#comments Tue, 07 Sep 2010 15:51:23 +0000 Ben Joan http://www.differencebetween.net/?p=13059 PAL Wii vs NTSC Wii

The Wii is another groundbreaking console for Nintendo with its out of the ordinary controller and totally new gameplay mechanics. If you are looking to join the millions who already own the Wii, there are basically two types that you have to choose from; the PAL version or the NTSC version. Basically, PAL and NTSC are TV standards which are not really compatible with each other. So the biggest difference between these two would be that PAL consoles would not work with NTSC TVs and vice versa.

The same incompatibility is also true when it comes to the games that you can play on either versions of the Wii console. PAL games would not play on NTSC consoles, and NTSC games would not play on PAL consoles because of the encoding used. When it comes to compatibility, PAL is a bit bitter as all PAL consoles can play all PAL games while not all NTSC consoles can play all NTSC games. The issue with NTSC is more on the region rather than the actual standard. Both Japan and the US use the NTSC standard but not all games in Japan are released in the US. So in general, US games are not playable in Japanese consoles and vice versa despite both consoles being under NTSC. The major advantage NTSC has over the PAL Wii is the huge number of games. If you are able to find a way to disregard the region information, you can play both JP and US games on your NTSC Wii without any trouble.

For most people, there is really very little reason to worry about whether you are getting an NTSC or PAL Wii as retailers in different countries only carry models that are compatible with the dominant standard in the country. If you are in a country that uses NTSC, only NTSC consoles would be sold there. The same is also true for games. Problems only arise when you import games from other countries. So you need to make sure that the country you are importing from uses the same standard as you.

Summary:

1. PAL Wiis would not work with NTSC only TVs and NTSC Wiis would not work with PAL only TVs

2. PAL games don’t work on NTSC Wiis and Wii games don’t work on PAL Wiis

3. All PAL Wiis can play all PAL Wii games but not all NTSC Wiis can play all NTSC games

4. The NTSC Wii has a lot more games for it than the PAL WiiYou might also like…

]]>
http://www.differencebetween.net/object/gadgets-object/difference-between-pal-wii-and-ntsc-wii/feed/ 0
Difference Between Android 2.1 and 2.2 http://www.differencebetween.net/object/gadgets-object/difference-between-android-2-1-and-2-2/ http://www.differencebetween.net/object/gadgets-object/difference-between-android-2-1-and-2-2/#comments Sun, 05 Sep 2010 16:57:35 +0000 Ben Joan http://www.differencebetween.net/?p=13064 Android 2.1 vs 2.2

Android 2.2, codenamed “frozen yogurt” or Froyo for short, is the latest version of Google’s Android operating system for smartphones. It replaces the older version 2.1, labeled Éclair. In general, speed and performance has been improved in version 2.2. So let’s discuss the more specific differences between 2.1 and 2.2.

Android 2.2 adds USB tethering or the ability to connect your smartphone to your computer or laptop and make it act like it’s your modem for Internet access. It can also utilize its Wi-Fi radio to act as a Wi-Fi hotspot for up to 8 other devices to connect to simultaneously. Another major update is the ability to install applications on removable storage. This ability has been desperately missed by Android users as most Android devices have a paltry amount of internal storage but can be expanded to almost limitless amounts. With this addition, the Android is now more like Windows Mobile than the iPhone.

Also in version 2.2 is the addition of support for Flash 10.1. This should keep Android devices compliant with sites and applications that shift to using the latest version of Flash. This also affects video viewing as Flash is used by a lot of video streaming sites like Youtube. Developers would probably benefit from the changes and additions to the APIs of Android 2.2 as they now have a lot of control over the device. Changes were made to the graphics, UI, device policy, camera, and media framework APIs.

For corporate users, more capabilities of Microsoft Exchange are supported by version 2.2. Features like auto-discovery, global address lists look-up, and Exchange calendars have now been added to make it easier for users to sync their accounts and organize their contacts and appointments. Exchange administrators can also increase security by implementing password policies on all devices on their system. It is also within their ability to remotely wipe the contents of the device in case it gets lost in order to prevent any confidential information from falling into the wrong hands.

Summary:

1. Android 2.2 has more speed and performance optimizations

2. Android 2.2 has USB tethering and Wi-Fi hotspot functionality not found in 2.1

3. Android 2.2 allows for app installation to the memory card while 2.1 does not

4. Android 2.2 adds Flash 10.1 support absent in 2.1

5. Android 2.2 has a lot of modified and added APIs

6. Android 2.2 improves support for Microsoft Exchange over 2.1

You might also like…

]]>
http://www.differencebetween.net/object/gadgets-object/difference-between-android-2-1-and-2-2/feed/ 0
Difference Between Apple iPhone 4 and SnapDragon http://www.differencebetween.net/object/gadgets-object/difference-between-apple-iphone-4-and-snapdragon/ http://www.differencebetween.net/object/gadgets-object/difference-between-apple-iphone-4-and-snapdragon/#comments Thu, 02 Sep 2010 00:31:44 +0000 Ben Joan http://www.differencebetween.net/?p=13040 Apple iPhone 4 vs SnapDragon

Although the iPhone is still the best selling smartphone with its latest version, the iPhone 4, there are a lot of new products that offer better features. Most of these new smartphones flaunt having something called the SnapDragon. The SnapDragon is actually a line of processors, and not a complete phone like the iPhone, which is the single most important component in any computer or smartphone. The reason why the SnapDragon is very popular is because of its excellent capabilities that can rival and even exceed the capabilities of the A4 processor found on the iPhone 4.

The biggest difference between the two is speed. The SnapDragon operates at a much higher frequency of 1Ghz with newer processors operating at up to 1.2,1.3, and even 1.5GHz. While the A4 processor of the iPhone can also reach clock speeds of 1Ghz, as demonstrated by the iPad, it is rumored that the A4 in the iPhone 4 is underclocked in order to reduce battery consumption and improve battery life. Apple has also created some shortcuts in order to avoid hitting performance issues, like the limited multi-tasking ability. New developments in the SnapDragon include a dual core version with each core running at whooping 1.5Ghz. This processor far exceeds the underclocked single core processor found on the iPhone. Although there are still doubts as to how this much power would translate in terms of power consumption and battery life.

As the A4 is proprietary to Apple and is only used on their products, a lot of Apple competitors like HTC, Sony Ericsson, Google, and LG have employed the SnapdDragon in some of their newer models. Because of the wide number of manufacturers who are employing the SnapDragon, it is also called upon to run different operating systems; Windows Mobile and Google Android to name two. The A4 is custom fitted to the iOS which is used with both the iPhone and iPad.

Summary:

1. The iPhone 4 processor is clocked much lower than most SnapDragons

2. The iPhone 4 is a phone while the SnapDragon is a processor

3. The iPhone 4 uses a single processor architecture while new SnapDragons are using the dual processor architecture

4. The SnapDragon is commonly used by a lot of the iPhone’s competitors

5. The SnapDragon is used by phones that run WM and Android while the iPhone 4 only runs the iOS

6.

7.

You might also like…

]]>
http://www.differencebetween.net/object/gadgets-object/difference-between-apple-iphone-4-and-snapdragon/feed/ 0
Difference Between Nikon P90 and Nikon P100 http://www.differencebetween.net/object/gadgets-object/difference-between-nikon-p90-and-nikon-p100/ http://www.differencebetween.net/object/gadgets-object/difference-between-nikon-p90-and-nikon-p100/#comments Mon, 30 Aug 2010 19:47:34 +0000 Ben Joan http://www.differencebetween.net/?p=13021

Nikon P90 vs Nikon P100

The P90 and P100 are two superzoom offerings from Nikon. There are a few differences that separate one from the other in terms of features and performance. To start with, the P90 has a 12 megapixel sensor while the P100 is only equipped with a 10 megapixel sensor. Although the sensor resolution of the P100 is lower than the P90’s, it is still higher than what most people would use. The sensor of the P90 is also a CCD while that of the P100 is a CMOS sensor. Each type of sensor has its own pros and cons so you should look up their differences for a more detailed discussion.

The P90 is better suited when you constantly taking pictures when the supplied lighting is far from ideal. Its ISO range is from 64 to 6400 while that of the P100 ranges from 80 to 3200. A higher ISO rating lets you take better images in darker situations without using the flash of the camera.

Another great thing about the P90 is its ability to take more continuous photos at 15 frames per second for up to 45 photos. It can even take photos before you press the shutter button, making it very desirable for fast action photography. Although the P100 can also be used for sports photography, it can only shoot at a lower speed of 10 frames per second.

Lastly, the zoom range of the P90 and P100 are far beyond what you would typically find in a fixed lens camera. It is more common in SLR cameras. The P90 can zoom up to 24x or the equivalent of 26-624mm. The P100 can zoom much further at 26x or the equivalent of 26-678mm. These are optical zooms that uses lenses to refract light and allow the camera to see much further, much like binoculars or telescopes. This is in contrast to digital zoom, which is like zooming into a photo on your computer. Optical zoom is always better than digital zoom.

Summary:
1. The P90 has a maximum resolution of 12 megapixels while the P100 has a maximum of 10 megapixels
2. The P90 uses a CCD sensor while the P100 uses a CMOS sensor
3. The P90 has a better ISO range than the P100
4. The P90 is better at taking continuous photos than the P100
5. The P100 has better zoom than the P90You might also like…

]]>
http://www.differencebetween.net/object/gadgets-object/difference-between-nikon-p90-and-nikon-p100/feed/ 0
Difference Between iPhone 4G and Samsung Vibrant http://www.differencebetween.net/object/gadgets-object/difference-between-iphone-4g-and-samsung-vibrant/ http://www.differencebetween.net/object/gadgets-object/difference-between-iphone-4g-and-samsung-vibrant/#comments Mon, 30 Aug 2010 15:39:48 +0000 Ben Joan http://www.differencebetween.net/?p=13018 iPhone 4G vs Samsung Vibrant

The iPhone 4, which is now considered to be the king of the smartphone hill, has had a few challengers and the Samsung Vibrant is one of the better ones. The Samsung Vibrant is just another version of the original Samsung Galaxy S, so their specs would be very similar to each other. First difference between the iPhone 4 and the Vibrant is the number of apps that they currently have. Since the iPhone 4 is running the iOS that has been around for quite some time and used by other Apple devices, it has a lot more apps than Android, which is the operating system of the Vibrant. This is expected to become less of factor as more people are programming for the Android.

As with the Galaxy S, the Vibrant has a 4 inch screen, which is much bigger than the 3.5 inch screen on the iPhone. Although the iPhone has the higher resolution, the bigger screen size is still more important. The Vibrant only has 16GB of internal memory while the iPhone comes in either a 16GB version or a 32GB one. Even though the internal memory of the vibrant is just equal to the lower capacity iPhone, its memory card slot means that you can insert a 32GB microSD card to expand your storage capacity. The iPhone lacks any card slot and the user is stuck with the amount of memory his unit has from the start.

An addition in the iPhone 4 is the front facing camera that allows for video calls but for Wi-Fi connections only. The Galaxy S had the same front facing camera that allows for video calls over 3G but it has been removed in the Vibrant; thus, the Vibrant does not have any video calling capabilities.

Lastly, the Vibrant is exclusive to T-Mobile but you do have the Galaxy S and its other variants when you are not subscribed to T-mobile. Although the iPhone is also available for subscription under different telephone companies in the world, you can still get an unlocked version from the Apple store and use it on whatever carrier you like.

Summary:
1. The iPhone has more apps than the Vibrant
2. The Vibrant has a bigger screen than the iPhone 4
3. The Vibrant can have more memory than the iPhone 4
4. The Vibrant has a user replaceable battery while the iPhone 4 does not
5. The Vibrant does not have a front facing camera like that of the iPhone 4
6. The Vibrant is exclusive to T-mobile while you can purchase unlocked iPhones from AppleYou might also like…

]]>
http://www.differencebetween.net/object/gadgets-object/difference-between-iphone-4g-and-samsung-vibrant/feed/ 1