Difference Between Similar Terms and Objects

Difference Between NGO and Non-Profit Organizations

ngo_bookNGO vs Non-Profit Organizations

Many people do not understand the principles of, and the differences between, NGO and Non-profit organizations, even though they are well-known terms in the 21st century. First of all, to clarify, NGO stands for a non-governmental organization, and a non-profit organization can also be referred to as a NPO.

Non-governmental organizations are created by legal persons who are not part of the government. Although NGO funds are mostly raised by the government, they maintain a non-governmental position, and eliminate the need for a government council. This type of organization is also known as a civil society organization. There are forty thousand international NGOs in the world, with the most organizations found in India.

In 1945, after the establishment of the United Nations Organization, the non-governmental organizations became extremely popular. Although, before this time, there were other organizations, such as the famous Rotary International, that began its operation in 1904. By the end of the year 1914, there were one thousand and eighty three NGOs in existence. International NGOs played a vital role in the anti-slavery movement, as well as in the movement for women’s suffrage. The official definition of international NGOs was defined on February 27, 1950, by the resolution 288 (X) of the ECOSOC.

Various types of Non-governmental organizations include:

BINGO ‘“ Big International NGO
CSO ‘“ Civil Society Organization
DONGO ‘“ Donor Organized NGO
ENGO ‘“ Environmental NGO
GONGO ‘“ Government-operated NGOs
INGO ‘“ International NGO
QUANGO – Quasi-autonomous NGO
TANGO ‘“ Technical Assistance NGO
GSO ‘“ Grassroots Support Organization
MANGO – Market Advocacy Organization

On the other hand, the non-profit organization does not divide its extra funds between its shareholders, or owners, but uses them for the organization’s purposes. Examples of these organizations are public arts organizations, trade unions and charitable organizations. They offer services and programs through federal, local or state entities. Non-profit organizations hire management personnel, and aim to raise substantial funds. These organizations are service organizations or charities that are established for co-operative, trust or purely informal reasons. NPOs are also known as endowments, or foundations that have huge stock funds. A supporting organization is similar to a non-profit organization, and also operates as a foundation, but they have more complicated structures.

Non-profit organizations do have legal responsibilities, and these may include:

Supervision and management provisions
Economic activity
Accountability and Auditing provisions
Provisions for the dissolution of the entity
Tax status of corporate and private donors
Representation
Tax status of the foundation
Provision for the amendment of the statutes or articles of incorporation

To summarize, the differences between a non-profit organization and NGOs are:

1.The NGO is a non-governmental organization. Its funds are raised by the government, but it maintains a non-governmental position, with no need for a government council. They are also known as civil society organizations.

2.A non-profit organization uses its extra funds for the purpose of the organization, rather than dividing it between the shareholders and the owners of the organization. Examples of NPOs are public arts organizations, trade unions and charitable organizations.


Search DifferenceBetween.net :

Custom Search



1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (34 votes, average: 2.32 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...


Email This Post Email This Post : If you like this article or our site. Please spread the word. Share it with your friends/family.



See more about : ,

22 Comments

  1. I would like to know if one organization can be both an NPO AND an NGO.

    We are already an NPO in Tanzania and would like to become a Tanzanian registered NGO. So far, I am finding no resources on this.

    Any help?
    Gayle

  2. We are two females who have a shared vision in empowering, developing and supporting the youth in their goals to reach their full potential. We’re looking into registering the company but do not know how to go about as we are currently conducting research , and whether we should register it as an NGO or an NPO…

    Please help
    Busi

  3. Congrats for this great thoughts. This should be an NPO as it is in volunteering nature

  4. I am researching different types of businesses and am wondering what the main difference is between NGO and Social Businesses?
    Any advice would be great.

    • see jennifer, if your are interested in social investment and has a clear intent to establish your separate entity,then you should go for a civil society entity or an ngo.

  5. I’m sorry, Colleen, but more formal distinctions between NGOs and NPOs need to be established here, if in fact they truly are different. Likewise, some of the distinctions listed here are misleading. Just as NGOs are created by “legal persons not a part of the government”, so are NPOs, as NPOs are generally not a product of the government or established as such, just like NGOs. In order to achieve tax-exempt status in the US, NPOs (and I suspect NGOs as well) must be approved as such by the IRS, but government oversight stops there, unless the NPO is specifically created in service to a government function as a mechanism operating independently of governing structures. All of the historic NGOs listed above, such as Rotary International, were initially NPOs, at least here in the United States, where their status had to be legally recognized. So, again, what really is the difference? Most NPOs today are privately established, just like NGOs.

    My understanding of NGOs and NPOs is that they both can generate profits, but that proceeds are reinvested back into the institution’s own growth rather than distributed out to shareholders or investors (which makes them donors). Is it possible the difference lies in the internal structure and governance of how these institutions operate? Then what are the mechanics? This article fails to make these distinctions. NPOs generally DO NOT offer their services through government “federal, local and state” entities as mentioned here — most are private and raise monies through both public and private sources. I would assume that NGOs, like NPOs above, can hire management and raise substantial funding of their own. NPOs are not limited to Foundations, but can include them, as NGOs perhaps may not.

    I am excited by the potential of the NGO concept being a nonprofit “business” structured as a business to conduct business, but is not driven by traditional profit motives to justify its worth — worth now being defined as service to the community instead of wealth to stockholders. And as some nonprofits clearly operate outside this business framework (such as churches), many NPOs appear in fact to be NGOs as well. So, are NGOs a subset of NPOs, or is there a substantial structural and legal difference between the two? Internal distinctions may be where clarity is realized.

  6. I agree that I am just as confused after reading this article as I was before finding it. I still cannot tell someone the difference between and NGO and NPO

  7. i still dont understand the diffrent between NPO and NGO

  8. If then NPO do not distribute its earnings to shareholders, that means no one (shareholder) is making or receiving any form of monetory appreciation?

  9. if a project is supported by the UN is it a non profit or ngo?

  10. At the general level, there really is no difference between NPOs and NGOs that is worth distinguishing between. Think about it…as John Shelton above says, all NPOs are not part of the government, that is, they are non-governmental organizations.

    And all NGOs that I can think of are not in the profit-making business, so that would make all (or most) of them non-profit organizations.

    These are just similar terms that have been developed for different reasons but represent essentially the same thing – orgs that are neither of the government nor of the profit-making spheres. There is a wide variety of organizations that fit into both terms…trade and labor unions, overseas development aid groups, neighborhood associations, advocacy groups, eco groups, foundations, etc etc.

    There might be legal distinctions that are useful if you’re an accountant or if you’re thinking of forming such an organization. For that, you’ll have to check your country’s laws, since each country is different. You won’t find your answer from this website.

  11. Can npo get the exemption in taxes as like ngo?

    • Mr.Naveen ,an ngo and an npo are both implicitly same entities if not exact in personalities.For your query i would like to say that,tax exemptions are for both

  12. please let me know the technical diff. b/w an ngo and an npo.

  13. I’m sorry, Colleen, but more formal distinctions between NGOs and NPOs need to be established here, if in fact they truly are different. Likewise, some of the distinctions listed here are misleading. Just as NGOs are created by “legal persons not a part of the government”, so are NPOs, as NPOs are generally not a product of the government or established as such, just like NGOs. In order to achieve tax-exempt status in the US, NPOs (and I suspect NGOs as well) must be approved as such by the IRS, but government oversight stops there, unless the NPO is specifically created in service to a government function as a mechanism operating independently of governing structures. All of the historic NGOs listed above, such as Rotary International, were initially NPOs, at least here in the United States, where their status had to be legally recognized. So, again, what really is the difference? Most NPOs today are privately established, just like NGOs.

    My understanding of NGOs and NPOs is that they both can generate profits, but that proceeds are reinvested back into the institution’s own growth rather than distributed out to shareholders or investors (which makes them donors). Is it possible the difference lies in the internal structure and governance of how these institutions operate? Then what are the mechanics? This article fails to make these distinctions. NPOs generally DO NOT offer their services through government “federal, local and state” entities as mentioned here — most are private and raise monies through both public and private sources. I would assume that NGOs, like NPOs above, can hire management and raise substantial funding of their own. NPOs are not limited to Foundations, but can include them, as NGOs perhaps may not.

    I am excited by the potential of the NGO concept being a nonprofit “business” structured as a business to conduct business, but is not driven by traditional profit motives to justify its worth — worth now being defined as service to the community instead of wealth to stockholders. And as some nonprofits clearly operate outside this business framework (such as churches), many NPOs appear in fact to be NGOs as well. So, are NGOs a subset of NPOs, or is there a substantial structural and legal difference between the two? Internal distinctions may be where clarity is realized.

    Read more: Difference Between NGO and Non-Profit Organizations | Difference Between | NGO vs Non-Profit Organizations http://www.differencebetween.net/business/difference-between-ngo-and-non-profit-organizations/#ixzz3EyxAf95y

  14. My understanding of NGOs and NPOs is that they both can generate profits, but that proceeds are reinvested back into the institution’s own growth rather than distributed out to shareholders or investors (which makes them donors). Is it possible the difference lies in the internal structure and governance of how these institutions operate? Then what are the mechanics? This article fails to make these distinctions. NPOs generally DO NOT offer their services through government “federal, local and state” entities as mentioned here — most are private and raise monies through both public and private sources. I would assume that NGOs, like NPOs above, can hire management and raise substantial funding of their own. NPOs are not limited to Foundations, but can include them, as NGOs perhaps may not.

    I am excited by the potential of the NGO concept being a nonprofit “business” structured as a business to conduct business, but is not driven by traditional profit motives to justify its worth — worth now being defined as service to the community instead of wealth to stockholders. And as some nonprofits clearly operate outside this business framework (such as churches), many NPOs appear in fact to be NGOs as well. So, are NGOs a subset of NPOs, or is there a substantial structural and legal difference between the two? Internal distinctions may be where clarity is realized.
    my mail id –
    rajeshlko92@gmail.com

  15. Leadership vs Management
    Leadership and management are two terms used to define group behavior in a professional or cultural setting. While leadership means setting up new goals, vision or planning a new strategy, management means controlling the group and organizing it to achieve pre-set goals and objectives according to the values and principles of the group.

    Leadership involves a core group or single individuals. Management, on the other hand, involves an entire group and the actions required to make it function in a coordinated manner to help achieve the goals set by the leaders of the group.

    Good leadership is all about managing the group properly while good management is about helping the leaders achieve the goals for the collective vision of the group. Management without leadership is usually a futile activity. Without proper leadership, the resources of a group cannot be managed for optimum output. For example, in the case of a country fighting for independence, unless there is proper leadership, there cannot be an optimum management of all freedom-fighters for achieving liberty.

    A leadership that cannot ensure proper management is a failure while management without proper leadership is of no use. Only active participatory action by leaders is considered true leadership. A figurehead monarch is not considered a leader.

    Leadership and management are inter-connected and inter-dependent concepts. Principles of management can continue to change with the changing times and requirements but the principles of leadership remain essentially the same throughout history.

    A leader, whether in the Roman times or the present New Age, would be required to exhibit the same qualities of virtue, valor, confidence, inspiration, etc but management of a Roman army would be completely different from the management of a modern army. Management principles are only behavioral aspects that alter with environment, culture and requirements while leadership principles make people go down in history as great men to inspire generations.

    my mail id -

    rajeshlko92@gmail.com

Leave a Response

Please note: comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.

Articles on DifferenceBetween.net are general information, and are not intended to substitute for professional advice. The information is "AS IS", "WITH ALL FAULTS". User assumes all risk of use, damage, or injury. You agree that we have no liability for any damages.


Protected by Copyscape Plagiarism Finder