Difference Between Similar Terms and Objects

Difference Between Technician and Technologist

technician-pdTechnician vs Technologist

Technician and technologist are two different terms. However, these two terms are interrelated. Most people think that these terms mean the same. but, when one looks a bit closer, one will find that they are different in many aspects. A technician and a technologist differ in their educational levels and responsibilities.

A technologist has a greater role than a technician. A technician is just a person with a practical understanding of technology. A technician has a good knowledge of the general principles of the field he is in, whereas, a technologist is a person who is completely aware of various technologies. A technician works under a technologist. A technologist’s position is above that of the technician.

First of all, when comparing their education, a technologist will have an engineering degree, whereas, a technician will have a lower degree, or some kind of diploma certificate. Generally, a technician course will last for one to two years, whereas a technologist will have to undergo a course that lasts for four to five years.

When talking about the duties of a technologist, he has a wider range of duties when compared to a technician. The technologist is the team leader, and his duties include research, analysing, designing, conducting studies, resolving problems, interpreting situations, evaluating situations, developing prototypes and guiding the technicians. On the other hand, a technician is the person who is involved with duties like maintenance, repairs and troubleshooting.

Another difference that can be seen, is that a technologist is solely responsible for innovative ideas, and the technician is responsible for the application of those ideas. Unlike technicians, technologists handle most of the more complex work.

Summary:

1. A technician and a technologist differ in their educational levels and responsibilities.

2. A technician is just a person with a practical understanding of technology. On the other hand, a technologist is a person who is completely aware of various technologies.

3. A technlogist has a greater role than a technician; a technician works under a technologist.

4. A technologist will have an engineering degree, whereas, a technician will have a lower degree, or some kind of diploma certificate.

5. A technologist has a wider range of duties when compared to a technician; his position is above the technician’s position in technological matters.

6. A technologist is solely responsible for innovative ideas, and the technician is responsible for the application of those ideas.

7. Unlike technicians, technologists handle most of the more complex work.


Search DifferenceBetween.net :

Custom Search



1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (12 votes, average: 3.50 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...


Email This Post Email This Post : If you like this article or our site. Please spread the word. Share it with your friends/family.



See more about :

9 Comments

  1. Correction to your article:

    A technologist goes to school for 2.5 or 3 years of education and receives a diploma in engineering technology. A technician goes to school for less and receives a technician diploma.

    • I disagree with the other Jon. A technologist is someone with a FOUR year degree from an ABET accredited university in an engineering technology field. The engineering technology degree allows graduates to either work in industry as a technologist or continue their studies and become an engineer. I should also stress that technologists have MUCH more practical knowledge than an engineering student, and in many cases, an experienced engineer.

      Calling a technologist a ‘technician’ is an insult. Usually only know-it-all engineers make this mistake. Technologists, in many states, can also earn a PE license after an extended wait time.

      • I am a Radiologic Technologist. In the united states medical imagin technologists are not required to have a four year degree, however that is about how long it takes to get through an accredited program. We are by no means engineers. However what differentiates us from a technician is our broader range of the study of imaging sciences beyond their application in the clinical field. Certainly’ it is the knowledge and understanding in addition to our credentials that qualifies us as technologists. This understanding of imaging physics, anatomy and physiology and pathology all play a part stin the decision making process on a day to day basis. Perhaps your definition pertains to the engineering world but for the medical imaging technologist, it is slightly different.

      • Great job Jon correcting the other Jon. I hold a Masters in the two of the Engineering Technology fields. Now there are a few colleges out there that offers BS in Engineering Technology within 3 years but its mostly its a 4 to 5 year degree program. You can also pursue a Masters in either Engineering or Engineering Technology. Technologist you can call us that but we are Engineering Technologists and we can hold Technologists, Technicians and Engineering jobs. I would not worry all about labels just learn your trade and improve your technical and engineering skills. You will hear traditional Engineers down grade a Engineering Technologist, but they are aware they cannot do it without us.

    • Katerina: thank you. I was going to express the same opinion and then I saw your post. The very word ‘just’ is very demeaning. It minimizes whomever you think of as ‘just’ (“they were just kids”). Meaning? Loosely translated, “We don’t have to be concerned with them…we can ignore, demean, or even punish them because they were ‘just’ kids…”

      And shame on you Jon#2! “Calling a technologist a ‘technician’ is an insult”…

      Please! Do not ever insult by comparison! It is so unfair, and again, demeaning. Maybe the male ego is a bit inflated here?

  2. I am a Radiologic Technologist. I went to a 2 year (continuous) accredited school with 21 pre-requisite credits (do the math for the education time) prior to acceptance into the program. The degree is an Associates in Science but just shy of a Bachelors credit-wise. In the imaging profession a technologist has more education, license requirements, qualification to administer radiation, and responsibility.

    A technician must practice under a technologist’s or physician’s license and direction and has a very limited scope of practice i.e. chest, hand and feet x-ray acquisition.

  3. I am concerned about word choice in this article. Although I hold B.S., M.S. and Ph.D., I take offense to the phrase “a technician is JUST a person who…” while “a technologist is a person who…” In other words, demeaning the human being who holds a technician position. Such subtle words are picked up and can certainly affect the worker. I understand the author (who may be biased) is attempting to show the difference between -nician and -ologist, but please, keep it to the education requirements and job duties; do not demean the individual. Thank you.

  4. Whomever chose to compose the article “Technician vs Technologist” appears to be displaying some underlying bias, which undermines the integrity of the article. It would be prudent of the site to provide a solely academic definition in place of this flawed opinion piece. Additionally, a broader perspective, removing the focus from any individual field, would lend credibility to any and all article submissions.

  5. This was one of the best answers I have received to a question I have asked in “Search”. Thank you.

Leave a Response

Please note: comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.

Articles on DifferenceBetween.net are general information, and are not intended to substitute for professional advice. The information is "AS IS", "WITH ALL FAULTS". User assumes all risk of use, damage, or injury. You agree that we have no liability for any damages.


Protected by Copyscape Plagiarism Finder