Difference Between Similar Terms and Objects

Difference Between Rights and Responsibilities

english wordsRights vs. Responsibilities

There is a common misconception about the interpretation of rights and responsibilities. At first glance, it would seem that the two terms are interchangeable. However, they are not. There are in fact several distinct differences between the two terms, which include legal determinations, and moral or ethical standards.

Rights are predominately privileges granted to individuals by governing bodies, and are generally written into laws. For example, in a Democratic country, the government may grant all of its people the ‘right’ to choose their own government by voting (exercising your franchise). Likewise, a government may write into law the ‘right’ to (exercise) free speech. Similarly, governments may grant ‘rights’ to individuals for more intangible things, like literary or artistic works(copyrights). Rights may also be granted on an individual or unique basis, by other governing bodies, like employers or partners through the mechanism of contracts. All such rights are built into a legal framework that allow them to be defended or challenged in a court of law.

It is important to remember that rights are granted based on an agreed set of behaviors and obligations, with the expectation of mutual respect and cooperation. A right, therefore, is not just a law that allows individuals or governing bodies to do or say anything they wish. It is the foundation or framework on which society as a whole structures and defines itself. Every right manifests itself through a series of obligations or duties that flow outward from the central law, like ripples on water. It is these obligations or duties that we commonly refer to as responsibilities.

Responsibility can be as limited to a list of duties assigned by an employer. It can also be broad, and morally or ethically accountable within the greater society. Responsibility can be assigned to an individual (your job description), or assumed by an individual (I broke it). It can be applied to an individual (the safe operation of a motor vehicle), or implied in the broader context of societal behavior (your children’s behavior). Whether in contractual law or social behavior, without responsibility nothing would ever be accomplished. Both right and responsibility exist in a symbiotic relationship that cannot be severed.

In summary:

1. A right is a privilege granted by a governing body that is written into law.

2. A right can be defended or challenged in a court of law.

3. A responsibility is a duty or obligation that is accepted, or put into action.


Search DifferenceBetween.net :

Custom Search


Help us improve. Rate this post! 1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (5 votes, average: 4.20 out of 5)
Loading...

Email This Post Email This Post : If you like this article or our site. Please spread the word. Share it with your friends/family.



2 Comments

  1. This is a very edjicational website

  2. This is such a load of bilge water. What makes this Constitutional Republic work is the concept that our Natural, God-given rights are just that – they are granted to us by God. They are NOT granted to us by “the government”. Because any government that grants rights can also take them away. The purpose of this government is to PROTECT our God-given Natural Rights, plain and simple.

    A good example of the BS that occurs around governments, rights, and responsibilities is the crapola surrounding ObananaCare and the thought that someone’s birth control is somehow a “right”. How is some slut’s or baby daddy’s birth control a “right”, but then I as a taxpayer am responsible for it? Huh? See what happens?

    As a child of God and a human being it is my RIGHT to protect my family, my property, and myself with a gun. All animals in nature protect themselves and their young. By whatever means necessary. Therefore, it is also my RESPONSIBILITY to exercise my right to self-protection. No government has given me a gun to go along with any government granted right to protect myself. It is simply one of many Natural Rights DEFINED AND STATED in the Constitution (and Declaration). It is NOT PROVIDED BY THE CONSTITUTION. It is the government’s duty to PROTECT MY RIGHT TO SELF-PROTECTION. PERIOD.

    And this is NOT A DEMOCRACY. The concept of pure democracy was one of the forms of government most feared by the Founders and Framers. A tyranny by democracy, where 50% + 1 is all that is necessary to start abrogating the citizen’s rights was proven to be a colossal failure by the Athenian Democracies 2500 years ago.

Leave a Response

Please note: comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.

Articles on DifferenceBetween.net are general information, and are not intended to substitute for professional advice. The information is "AS IS", "WITH ALL FAULTS". User assumes all risk of use, damage, or injury. You agree that we have no liability for any damages.


See more about : ,
Protected by Copyscape Plagiarism Finder