JMeter vs LoadRunner
JMeter and LoadRunner are two different performance testing tools. Performance testing tools are tools in the software field by which different types of applications used in the software are tested. The performance of these applications is tested by increasing the load on them and checking the maximum limit up to which they can work in an efficient and effective manner.
JMeter is a tool which is used to test and analyze the load on client and server applications. It is a Java tool. JMeter was developed by Apache Software Foundation, Jakarta, or Apache JMeter for short. It is open-source software to measure the performance and test the functional behavior. Initially, this tool was developed to analyze Web applications but presently has stretched to other functions.
JMeter can run its tests on various platforms both static and dynamic as Java objects, FTP servers, files, servlets, SOAP, databases and queries, Pearl scripts, HTTP, POP3, and many more.
LoadRunner is an automated interactive tool which is used to test the performance of an application. This testing tool is developed by Mercury Interactive to aid in determining the behavior of server and network applications under load normal, stress, and prolonged testing. The LoadRunner performance testing tool was later on taken over by Hewlett-Packard in November, 2006. Mercury has a brand value when comes to testing tools.
LoadRunner consists of various tools, such as:
Virtual User Generator or VuGen
LoadRunner supports various application environments, databases, and platforms as Web Service, J2EE, .net, ERP/CRM applications from Oracle, SAP, PeopleSoft and Siebel, streaming and wireless media.
It is an extensive tool which can identify most of the bugs. It collects system and component level performance information through an exhaustive array of diagnostic modules and system monitors.
LoadRunner presents you with precise information of end-to-end system performance. It helps to establish the fact that the upgraded versions of the applications are at par with the specified requirements of performance and also eradicates the performance barriers.
1.JMeter is free while LoadRunner is expensive.
2.JMeter licenses on installation while the LoadRunner license is based on the number of virtual users.
3.JMeter has an unlimited load generation capacity while LoadRunner has a limited load generation capacity.
4.JMeter is technically less proficient while LoadRunner is highly developed and complex.
5.JMeter lacks in the user interface while that of LoadRunner is impressive.