Difference Between Similar Terms and Objects

Difference Between Hinduism and Hindutva


The term Hindu or any reference to it has never been found in any ancient epic literature, be it religious like Vedas, mythological like Purana, Ramayana, or Mahabharata, and philosophical like Gita. Even the greatest Sanskrit scholar, poet, and dramatist Kalidasa has never used the term in any of his writings. The term Hindu was coined probably by someone in the army of Alexander the great, to refer to the people living on the southern side of the river Shindhu (Indus). Before that India or Hindustan as it geographically was then called Aryabart. During the 17th century British colonial rule in India, people of India came to be known as Hindus, and Hinduism as the main religion of India. The terms Hinduism and Hindutva both, though find their root in Hindu, they have very fundamental and practical differences between themselves. In some contexts they are even opposed to each other. Here we attempt to highlight the major differences between the two in respect of concept, application and consequences.


Concept: Hinduism is the dominant religion of India or Hindustan (land of Hindus) and Nepal and is also practiced by many people of Indonesia, Cambodia, Srilanka, Philippines, South Africa, Pakistan, Bangladesh, and some caribbean island states. Hinduism has a number of sects, sub-sects, traditions, beliefs. This is the oldest religion and is followed by about 1250 million people all over the world. There is a wide spectrum of social laws and ethical norms prescribed to regulate moral lives of people based on Karma (deeds), Dharma (spiritual and intellectual possession), and Gyana (wisdom). Hinduism is rooted in the idea of Sanatana dharma, as envisaged by Indian Rishis (saints) during the time of Vedas and Puranas (about 2500 BC). Sanatana Dharma or Hinduism is a highly intellectual, spiritual, as well as philosophical explanation of life and death with deep emphasis on leading a meaning-full life, and union with Paramatma (God) in the after-life. One of the distinct features of Hinduism is that there has never been any attempt by any individual or any organization to spread the religion or establish it as an element of identity of people. As a consequence, the philosophy of Hinduism and the prescriptions of moral living as criteria of choosing good over evil as stated in the ancient Indian religious scriptures are applicable to anybody irrespective of the religious belief the person might subscribe to. This is not without reason that Muslims, Christians, and people from other religious denominations in India are referred to as Hindus by people living in other parts of the world.

The term Hindutva, on the other hand, was coined by Hindu nationalist leader and champion of Hindu causes, Vinayak Damodar Savarkar, in his famous 1923 pamphlet ‘Hindutva: Who is a Hindu?’. Hindutva, as it is understood, is an ideology that is identified with Indian culture in the light of Hindu values. The term Hindutva has been nursed and popularized by the largest Hindu nationalistic conglomerate Sangh Parivar and its numerous affiliates. Sangh Parivar recognizes Hindutva as a broad term encompassing everything that is indigenously Indian, and must exclude any thing that is imported to India with spread of other religions from across the geographical border of ancient India.

Connotation: The term Hinduism or Sanatana Dharma is the inner dimension of Hindu religion. Thus it is religious in meaning, connotation, and emphasis. The core of Hinduism lies in purity of the soul as the stepping stone to union with the divine power. This purity can be achieved by any of the three means, namely Vakti or devotion, Gyana or knowledge, and Karma or good deeds. Power of Hinduism is derived from unquestioned faith in what is written in Vedas (chants of worship), Puranas (mythological stories of Gods and Goddesses), Shastras (theories on ethics, politics, economics, and sociology), and Slokas (praising Gods, Goddesses, and Saints).

On the other hand, the term Hindutva is more political in meaning, connotation, and emphasis. Hinduism and its references are found in Chaitanya Kathamrita and other 12th century onwards religious literature. Hindutva has been coined in the early 20th century. Hindutva has been and is still being used as a very powerful political weapon in the hands of the pro-Hindu politico-religious umbrella organization namely Sangh Parivar, which is very powerful and financially extremely well placed. Sangh Parivar, through its numerous affiliates, wants to establish a political and social system with clear hegemony of Hindus either by birth or through conversion.

With 81 percent Hindu population, the pro-Hindu agenda of the Sangh Parivar are very effectively transmitted to the electorate through massive propaganda of Hindutva which very precisely means that anything attached to Hindu belief or practice is pious and must visibly prevail in the society. Political appeal of Hindutva is so tense that every political party be it secular, leftist, or nationalist, resort to soft Hindutva, and restrain from saying anything that hurts Hindu sentiment. It is not an irony that corporate houses and business tycoons of India spend exorbitantly in building state-of-the-art Hindu temples and voluntarily donate huge sums of money to encourage and promote Hindu religious festivals.

Objective: Objective of Hinduism is to guide human beings to live meaning-full lives and know God through the alternative means as postulated in the ancient religious literatures. Knowing God is called Moksha in Sanskrit. On the other hand the protagonists of Hindutva aim at capturing political power through constitutional means and simultaneously establishing a social system with Hindu-only practices and customs. According to the votaries of Hindutva, Indian nationalism must be allied with Hindu pride. They view being Hindu as a precondition to being a nationalist.

Attitude towards Other Religions: Hinduism or Sanatana Dharma, to be precise, is the oldest religion, and arrived much before the other main-stream religions. As such, there is no reference of any other religion in the Hindu religious scriptures. Hinduism is meant for anybody and everybody. Love for human beings and for that matter any living creature is a core lesson of Hinduism. Whereas Hindutva has no place for anybody who is not a Hindu or who does not accept hegemony of Hindus.

Idea of Society: Hinduism is democratic in attitude and suggests a pluralistic and diversified society with due respect to opposing views. Hindutva, on the other hand, believes in a monolithic society with clear domination of Hindu religious practices, customs, and traditions.

Followings: Approximately 82% of Indian population follow and practice Hinduism. But this whole 82% or about .92 billion Hindus do not follow or support Hindutva, rather a microscopic minority do. Thus Hinduism has mass following, Hindutva does not have.

Deity-Icon: Hinduism has a number of sects and sub-sects and different traditional religious practices. Different Gods and Goddesses are worshiped by followers of different sects. All such Gods and Goddesses are worshiped in Hinduism. But Hindutva, though believes in such diversity, propagates Lord Rama as the icon of Hindutva.


1. The core concept of Hinduism is leading a meaning-full life whereas that of Hindutva is hegemony of Hindu beliefs and practices.

2. Hinduism guides people towards Moksha, whereas Hindutva guides people to acquire political power.

3. Hinduism is a religious believe, but Hindutva is a political movement.

4. Hinduism never supports violence to believers of other religions. Hindutva, on the other hand, promotes non-tolerance, even hatred to other religions.

5. Hinduism holds a pluralistic view of society, but Hindutva believes in a monolithic society with Hindu domination.

6. Hinduism is followed by overwhelming majority of Hindus, but only microscopic minority of Hindus follow Hindutva.

7. Hinduism recognizes a number of Gods and Goddesses, but Hindutva ionizes Lord Rama as trade-mark of Hindutva.

Sharing is caring!

Search DifferenceBetween.net :

Email This Post Email This Post : If you like this article or our site. Please spread the word. Share it with your friends/family.


  1. So thought provoking…

    • I have always believed Hinduism is not a religion but a way of life that embraces with nature. Hindutva is a figment of imagination from an ideology of just one man, it is therefore left to the people to decide the choice to make. The way I see it, this term Hindutva came about during the British rule of India where the believers of Hinduism practiced non-violence and went about their daily lives as if the British were not a threat to anyone, but in reality, the British were busy looting the country and enriching their kingdom in Britain whilst many in India were dying of starvation where over four million people died due to this. Savarkar saw this as a threat to the country and to change the mindset of the people to come out of their beliefs and to fight for their freedom and hence he brought about Hindutva. In all books, I have read not one of them makes mention of either Hindu or Hindutva….

  2. Hii,
    Thank you for sharing the information regarding Hinduism and Hindutva. Hinduism is the dominant religion of India or Hindustan and Nepal and is also practiced by many people of Indonesia, Cambodia, Srilanka, Philippines, South Africa, Pakistan, Bangladesh, and some Caribbean island states.
    Hindutva, on the other hand, was coined by Hindu nationalist leader and champion of Hindu causes, Vinayak Damodar Savarkar, in his famous 1923 pamphlet ‘Hindutva

  3. I just want to ask who write that hindutav ask to aquire political power and LORD RAM as a trade mark ?

  4. Any word enters the lexicon becomes reinforced by constant usage, over a considerably long time, having been accepted by a wide spectrum of society; the fact that certain section of people are repeatedly called “pseudo-secular” does not mean it will necessarily enter the lexicon with exactly that meaning, until nearly everyone has agreed to its definite meaning. In the same way, your definition of “Hindutva” is an aspirational one, something you would like to see being accepted; it is not a dictionary-definition. This is made especially clear in the way you have cited yourself as well as the references you have quoted. When you see another article on this website (I looked up “Difference between Gestational Diabetes and Type 2 Diabetes” by Dr Rae Osborn wherein, her picture and a detailed biography is given, as well as a long list of credible references are given), you can clearly make out this point. Articles like yours will only serve to bring down the credibility of this website. Kindly remove it. Please only post information and articles that have been proven to be authentic and supported by people who have done good solid research.

  5. Whoever wrote this has zero or very shallow input about Sanatana dharma . So when you know nothing about Hindutva better stay out of it

  6. Coin a new word. Give it a meaning, create a article on wikipedia that suites the left narrative. Its like anybody can form new words, create a new dictionary.

  7. Whoever has written this article is seriously misinformed or is being intentionally biased.
    ISM is an ideology
    TATVA is essence.
    Rather than limiting the Faith to an anglicized concept of ideology, term Hindutva tries to find the essence of Hindu faith and try and answer to an question – Who should be called a Hindu? Unlike Abrahamic faiths Hindu folks does not have markers or centralized canon which sets boundaries of Faith and Sacrilege. Anyone who is blessed with Land of Saptasidhu as the Paternal Land, Anyone who believes in the deities, faiths, beliefs which originated in this holy land should be considered a Hindu. Hindutva aims unite the Hindu folks, rise above the caste and sects and be proud of our indigenous faiths.
    Where is non tolerance here? Where is hatred ?

Leave a Response

Please note: comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.

References :





Articles on DifferenceBetween.net are general information, and are not intended to substitute for professional advice. The information is "AS IS", "WITH ALL FAULTS". User assumes all risk of use, damage, or injury. You agree that we have no liability for any damages.

See more about : ,
Protected by Copyscape Plagiarism Finder