4 responses

  1. John
    October 29, 2014

    The information given in the beginning of this article is erroneous. The Chicago Manual of Style, (15th ed., sec. 15.72) as well as many other sources, specify that the plural of the abbreviation “lb.” for pound is simply “lb.” Lb. is short for the Latin term “librum.” Latin does not use the letter s to denote the plural. Adding an “s” to the abbreviation “lb.” makes the term “poundses,”which is obviously incorrect. Please ensure your information is accurate.

    Reply

    • John
      January 30, 2018

      The author already states that which is in your response, in the last two sentences of his second paragraph: “… the standard abbreviation for pound, whether singular or plural, is ‘lb.’ The common usage of ‘lbs.’ doesn’t reflect the Latin usage of the abbreviation.”

      Please ensure your responses are correct.

      Reply

  2. Greg
    October 22, 2020

    Wow you sure had one hell of a character change in 4 years, John.

    Reply

    • Amy
      February 24, 2021

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top
mobile desktop