15 responses

  1. Ankit Jaiswal
    April 29, 2015

    I can see lots of differences betweens on this site and can’t stop exploring. All weapons are dangerous.

    Reply

    • Mark
      November 29, 2016

      Hippos, mosquitos, multi-drug-and-antibiotic-resistant bacterium (MRSA, MDR-Tuburculosis & XDR-TB (Citizens of the South Western, US, you know what I mean), thunderstorms, commercial airliners (shall we do a Compare/Contrast vs. US Military fixed-wing aircraft; and see which group has a lower probability of one of the myriad metrics we can apply?), sadly: Our neighbours for 15 years might have a big-ass hole, a basket, hose, and lots of lotion inside their home, not to mention your automobile and it’s ability to cause incredible horror upon innocent drivers sharing the roads! Let’s BAN them! Speech will follow shortly, as feelings are easily ‘hurt’ these days, LOL! Oops, I forgot another dangerous weapon. Well, he’s more the benefactor and Director for those paid Morons causing violence and harming innocent people and destroying SMBs. But yeah mate, “all weapons are bad”. I’ve a Black Belt. Does that mean I’m a threat, simply by default?

      Cheers,

      M. Renton

      Reply

      • Mark
        November 29, 2016

        Silly me. Forgot to provide an example. The individual of whom I spoke, is the multi-billion USD Hedge Fund Manager; Mr. George Soros.

        Meant Culpa! Merry Christmas and Cheers!

        M. Renton

        Reply

      • Jgraff49
        February 21, 2018

        When was the last time a thunderstorm walked into a school and slaughtered 17 students?

        Reply

      • Thomas Goenner
        March 7, 2018

        Do you mean like the Terrible Killer tornadoes that have been tearing up the country so badly the last few years???

        Reply

  2. Bill Mill
    July 31, 2015

    All weapons are not dangerous – its the people and how they handle weapons that makes them dangerous.

    Reply

    • David
      December 8, 2015

      That is what is called the “guns don’t kill people” idea.

      Reply

    • Nauman
      September 2, 2016

      Why would anyone be having a weapon if he doesn’t like harming people.

      Reply

      • Georges LeFluere
        September 29, 2016

        A policeman might have one if you were being attacked by a machete-wielding terrorist ; a soldier might carry one to repulse an attack on a childrens’ hospital . Also , a guide might carry one to protect a tourist traveling at danger to animal attacks .

        Reply

      • Emmanuel Hernandez
        November 7, 2016

        When mankind first discovered fire, they began eating games in a more digestible manner. He increased the availability of food in his diet because not only did he make food more available for sustenance but for therapeutic purposes as well. He in effect needed fire to process food in a lot of ways. He then invented traps to have food. Then he fashioned a spear to kill games for food. Then blow pipes with poisoned tips to kill games for food. Then bow and arrow to kill animals for food. Then manufactured guns to easily take down games for food. Nauman, excuse me for saying it, you have the most narrow-minded view of what a device is being used for. I for instance, hit the punching bag to get in shape and not to harm people with my fist.

        Reply

    • Annie Dawg
      October 28, 2016

      Actually, I believe a ‘weapon’ is by definition ‘dangerous’. A gun is a device designed to do harm. These type of assault rifles are specifically designed for killing people. Best case scenario, ‘good’ owner keeps his AR secure in its safe and has the peace of mind knowing that whatever life event comes up, for better or worse, owner will have power to immediately take another person’s life or take their own life if they wish!

      Reply

      • Mark Renton
        January 22, 2017

        Yes, these are actual Assault Rifles, fully automatic, and come in several different designs; such as the addition of a K-Bar, or a degrade launcher. If you want to play with these you need to: Enlist in your Military, join the Sinola Drug Cartel, or acquire one via nefarious means. If the later, you obviously have a connection to organised crime and have zero regard for the law (US or International Laws), so this topic shouldn’t even appear as a blip on the radar screen.
        The “Assault Rifles” you can purchase at many a big-box, or specialty store, are merely hunting Rifles, 30-06, AR-15, Shotguns, et al., but if you’ve the money and desire, you can accessorise your Rifle and aside from looking like a Military/SWAT, many of these accessories are rather funtional/useful, but, they do not change the facts: They are not Assault Rifles, they are not fully-auto, and you can not purchase many types of the specialised ammunition offered for aforementioned Military Standard Issue Field Rifles.

        As to why have them anyway? Like Former United States President Ronald W. Reagan said when he reversed Former President Carter’s decision to cancel the development and deployment of the B-1B Lancer (a supersonic, variable degree swept wing, utilising stealth-like technology that would grow and help improve our stealth platforms. Ex: low RCS, RAM paint, geometrical/angle design, dispersal of exhaust = a smaller heat signature, and the ability to ‘Hug The Earth’ whilst travelling at extremely high speed and avoiding most radar bands, thus allowing the Lancer to deliver either a shitload of munitions, and/or launch JSO/AGM or cruise missiles capable of delivering a significant thermonuclear payload. Sorry, but most individuals know so little about these incredible aircraft, I felt the need to explain a bit more about why the Lancer is so important.) Pres. Reagan answered the question with a brilliant, simple, and direct answer to:

        Repoter – “Why do we need 100 of these Bombers?”

        Pres. Reagan – “So we NEVER have to deploy them.”

        Reply

      • Doug
        January 26, 2017

        “you can not purchase many types of the specialised ammunition offered for aforementioned Military Standard Issue Field Rifles.”
        You can buy all the same ammo you want that is used in the M-16 variants that the military uses. The military ammo is typically not as high quality as the civilian manufacturers ammo, that is why the more popular ammos are the hunting or plinking rounds. Most ar15s are “military grade” which means they can operate with either 5.56 or .223 ammo. They just arent set up with a trigger system that can shoot full auto or burst.

        “Yes, these are actual Assault Rifles, fully automatic, and come in several different designs; such as the addition of a K-Bar, or a degrade launcher. If you want to play with these you need to: Enlist in your Military, join the Sinola Drug Cartel, or acquire one via nefarious means. If the later, you obviously have a connection to organised crime and have zero regard for the law (US or International Laws), so this topic shouldn’t even appear as a blip on the radar screen.”
        You can also legally purchase and own a fully automatic firearm in the US. You have to have a a special license, that has very strict background checks and is not easy to get. You also have to be willing to invest a lot of money to purchase a fully auto variant of a specific firearm, as they typically cost tens of thousands. The firearms are licensed with the ATF and are not easily transferred.

        Reply

      • Thomas Goenner
        March 7, 2018

        So a BB ‘Gun’ was Designed to kill People? Grow Up!

        Reply

  3. Doug
    September 28, 2016

    The AK isnt the most common small firearm in the world. Mauser still currently holds that title @ 125+ million. The AK is the most used firearm in militaries around the world.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top
mobile desktop