5 responses

  1. TH
    January 27, 2014

    I believe that “with whom you are having trouble getting along with” has one “with” too many. It is acceptable to say “with whom you are having trouble getting along” and, in common speech, ignoring the rule of not ending your sentences with a preposition (which is somewhat over-stated), you could even say “who you are having trouble getting along with” (and, in fact, you could consider “along with” as a phrasal verb, which would be perfectly okay to finish a sentence with – irony intended).

    Reply

    • Scott
      March 10, 2014

      Along with would be a compound adverb or adverbial phrase not a phrasal verb. “To smack of” is a phrasal verb and contains a verb which is required of the phrase being used as a phrasal verb; “along with” contains a preposition and an adverb, and lacks a verb, therefore disqualifying it as a phrasal verb and making it more properly a compound adverb even over an adverbial phrase as the syntax you are sighting leaves the preposition dangling without a noun. Prepositions should not be used to end a sentence as they are by their very nature placed before (pre position) a noun in order to change the nouns case, if they do not follow a noun and end a sentence the are positioned in front of nothing and that just defies their name and definition. That is why sentences do not end in prepositions.

      Reply

  2. Terese
    June 17, 2017

    I feel like an introduction telling us that “people communicate by language” is a tad bit ridiculous. The whole introduction I felt like, “why am I reading this?” And, “what does this have to do with the subject, the difference between sarcasm and facetious?”

    The rest of the article was a good read. I was left feeling a tad bit unsatisfied by your explanation of “facetious”. Maybe a quick conversation as to why the two are not perfect synonyms would solve the unanswered questions I have.

    Reply

    • bbongo billie
      August 23, 2018

      Tad too much “tad.”. Tads all I’m saying.

      Reply

  3. Bverji
    May 7, 2019

    This is not the difference between modern definitions of sarcasm and facetious. Sarcasm today is generally benign. Today, sarcasm refers to exaggeration to point out that the opposite point is true, where facetiousness exaggerates merely for the aim to be funny.

    Sarcasm “I’ll get right on that”
    Facetious “I’m so hungry I could eat a horse”

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top
mobile desktop