4 responses

  1. Craig Harrison
    December 22, 2014

    I have never read such a convoluted explanation containing such blatant inaccuracies. Article 3 of the Constitution states there are supposed to be Judges appointed to the Supreme Court, not Justices!!! Without a Constitutional Convention Congress changed them illegally, not in accordance with Article 5, to Justices…And to top it off, they are still appointed. Go figure… The Constitution never intended exchanges of function or definition regarding Judge and Justice. What’s wrong with this picture?? By changing the supreme court’s function, it empowers the federal empire well beyond the intent of the Constitution.

    Reply

    • Nathan Tolani
      September 19, 2019

      Wow! Thank you Craig Harrison for a comprehensive break down and sensible intervention of the difference between Judges and Justice.

      Kind Regards

      Reply

  2. Ali Abdullah Sadiq
    December 8, 2021

    Therefore; if a judge handles legal matters; and he is of a lower court;and he takes on a case he has no jurisdiction over;
    [that] would definitely a “judge”; since a “justice” would have jurisdiction in all things “federal”. Correct?

    Reply

  3. Walumoli Dean
    January 7, 2022

    I thought that ajustice is above the judge in rankings.how many justices do we have and judges in Uganda

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top
mobile desktop