15 responses

  1. SUNDEEP
    March 28, 2012

    Hindi is not the National Language of India. In fact, India does not have a national language. Its is the most widely spoken language in India.

    Reply

    • arvind ghosh
      November 26, 2018

      urdu is called fauzi language. it’s origin lies in turkish and pathan invaders. when pathans and mughals came to india and ruled hindus , they wanted to communicate with local hindus with a mixture of parsi , and turkic language.
      thus a mixed language developed during turkic , pathan , and mughal rulers. this language later known as urdu. urdu is not a language of pakistani ethnic people. sindhi, balochi, punjabi, and kpk people all have their own spoken language. only mohazirs , ie. muslims who migrated there from u.p. and hyderabad and other places are urdu speakers.however all native people of pakistan use farsi script. just like all european language use roman alphabet.
      urdu is also spoken by in some places by hindus as their mother tongue. and hindi is also spokenby some muslims as their mother tongue in sultanpur ,u.p. sindhi languge and punjabi language both written in farsi and devnagari scrpts.

      Reply

      • Azeemullah
        January 23, 2020

        I agree with Arvind gosh and like to remind that there was no separate India,Pakistan,and Bangladesh in those days. When the Muslim invaders came to India and started spreading Islam, a spoken language evolved for communication which when written in Persian was called Urdu and when written in Devanagari came to be known as Hindi. So Hindi,Urdu,Hindustani whatever name its is called;evolved in India,it is an Indian language not of Pakistan.

        Reply

  2. Khany
    January 24, 2017

    I dont agree 100%. Urdu language is a mix of Persian Farsi, Turkish and Arabic. Hindi language uses Urdu but some religous wordings are from Hinduisms Holy books. Thats how it became as todays Hindi language. Urdu is the root language of Punjabi, Hindi, Patwari, etc!

    Reply

    • Jaspreet
      March 2, 2017

      That’a completely false. Urdu does have a lot of Persian, Arabic and Turkish loanwords but the bulk of the language has Sanskrit origin, just like Hindi. It still is after all an Indian language. If Urdu is only a mixture of the three language then it wouldn’t be intelligible with Hindi, but it is.

      Urdu is not the root of Punjabi, Hindi etc. Sanskrit is the root of all north Indian languages, including Urdu but has been heavily influenced by middle eastern languages. Hence, this is why it’s the preferred language of Pakistanis and Muslim Indians.

      Anyone who denies Urdus origin to Sanskrit/Hindi is obviously in denial of the origins of the language they speak.

      Reply

      • Adam
        October 8, 2018

        You are a complete idiot and talking bullshit. I don’t have any time to waste with you.

        Reply

      • Hindi
        December 23, 2018

        Urdu is only Hindi mixtured with persian and Arabic words spoken by Afghan invaders

        Reply

    • Hindi
      December 23, 2018

      Urdu was a broken language 300 year ago,while Hindi and Punjabi were mature languages for about 3000 years.
      Wali Dakni was the first Urdu poet 300 year ago means urdu language started to born,while earlier it was a broken Hindi spoken by Afghan invaders.

      Reply

      • Sudhir
        January 21, 2022

        There was no language called Hindi in India till around the 18th century. The spoken language in the northern parts of India was Pali/Prakrit. The Hindustani or Hindavi language evolved as the camp language of the Turkish and Moghul army. In fact the word Urdu in Turkish means Army. The normal day to day words of that language were taken from Turkish and Arabic. Hindustani is essentially Urdu. Later Hindi and Urdu evolved into two different languages with Hindi trying to import Sanskrit based words. Strictly speaking Hindi and Urdu should not be classified as Indo-European.

        Reply

  3. Pratik Shahaji Patil
    November 6, 2018

    Hindi is not national language of India

    Reply

  4. Kumar
    April 9, 2019

    Urdu and hindi is one single language have two writing script
    Orgin of both (Urdu and hindi) from Delhi
    This mean one language have two writing scripts
    Urdu written in Perso-Arabic script and use haveily Persian and arbic words while hindi have also influency of More sansakrit and less Persian Arabic too…..
    But half billion Muslim live in India Pakistan and Bangladesh and daily basis communication with hindi speaker that’s why this hindi urdu become one single language as a hindustani. Which is more popular in all sub continent India-Pakistan etc etc
    Hindustanii. Is mixture of urdu and hindi …
    Hindustani. Is neither pure hindi nor pure urdu..but in between. ..
    That is popular in All south Asia specially India and Pakistan

    This is definition of hindi-Urdu and Hindustani.

    Reply

  5. Kannan raja gopal
    September 26, 2019

    Hindi and Urdu are not Indian languages. These two languages are created by invaders. Even Sanskrit is also not a Indian language, because Sanskrit speaking nomadic people’s who entered in India before first century by with their cattle. That time Sanskrit was not having any writing words. It was only a spoken language. Later where ever they join with original Indians they learned the local languages and the written the books in Dravidian languages like Tamil, Telugu and Kannada only. Later 5th century only from the Dravidian languages called Sanskrit is developed and later by 12th century they kept the name Deva nagary.

    Reply

  6. Dr. Mahinder Singh
    May 23, 2020

    It is said that Moghul ruler Jhangir had Major language problems of communication between his Arab and Indian forces. He commissioned Amir Khusroo who had knowledge of Hindi, Arabic, Persian etc to develop a common language. Moguls were also forcibly converting to Islam. Urdu language with Arabic script and Hindi mix came to be known as Urdu. Moghul invaders invariably came from North West frontier province and maximum conversion took place, in what is now known as Afghanistan, Pakistan etc.

    Reply

    • Farooq Rafi
      November 27, 2021

      Amir Khusro lived at least 300 years before Jahangir and before Mughals came to India. So your assertion is factually not correct. Then the phrases such as Mughals were forcibly converting to Islam speaks more of a religious bias than a comment in the history of languages. This religious bias is common in Most Indians as this is how the history is taught in India and propagated continuously through the media. Similarly in Pakistan, Hindus are shown as inferior and conniving. I believe the educated and enlightened people in both countries should raise above this pettiness and make a strong common approach with respect to become a prosperous, enlightened, tolerant and educated subcontinent that is beckon of progress to the entire world.

      Reply

  7. bob bill luffy
    July 11, 2020

    no itrs

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top
mobile desktop