18 responses

  1. P
    November 23, 2012

    The US did not kill Saddam Hussein.

    Reply

  2. Tigz
    November 1, 2013

    #6 is an opinion of the author, not a fact.
    The entire article is slanted to the writers opinion. And should not be used as a valid reference for research.

    Reply

    • Omar Tariq
      January 1, 2015

      Lol, totally agree.

      Reply

    • David Davidson
      January 4, 2015

      It’s not necessarily an opinion considering it is true for pretty much every Dictator and Monarch during their riegn. It was a little misleading because he didn’t specify Absolute Monarchy.

      I do agree that this should not be used or cited in any serious research paper.

      Reply

  3. Thomas
    November 17, 2014

    Based on this article alone, is Kim Jong Un a monarch then and not a dictator?

    Reply

    • Matthew
      March 2, 2015

      1: There have been plenty of monarchs throughout history that have gotten their crown through force, you have to look no further then england to see several examples. North Korea is also a good example of a dictatorship that was gotten peacefully, or at least the latest ruler got it peacefully.

      2: A lot of monarchs ruled their countries the same way dictators do now, so they are no different in this respect.

      3: This doesn’t explain what makes a dictator seperate to a king/queen.

      4: Again, monarchs have taken power through military takeovers/rebellions. North Korea is still a good example of how rulership has been passed down through the family in a dictatorship.

      5: While it might be pretty clear how most current monarchies are different to current dictatorships, it isn’t clear how absolute monarchies are different to dictatorships.

      6: Monarchs have ruled successfully for many centuries, and there are several ways in how monarchies/dictatorships can be better then current democratic systems. This summary seems to be more a personal bias then anything else.

      All in all, this did not provide me with any new information, and it seems to more insulting non democratic forms of government then providing an actual logical explanation on how monarchies and dictatorships are different.

      Reply

    • Rohan Roger David Zener
      April 3, 2016

      He’s an absolute monarch, because he is the dictator, after all, and the singular ruler (or “monarch”) of North Korea. But given that he’s also worshiped as some god among men, North Korea is actually a theocracy.

      Reply

    • Patrick Shane Nichols
      February 24, 2019

      He is. A dictatorship can turn into a monarchy, which is the case for North Korea.

      Reply

  4. bill nyutte
    December 6, 2015

    In response to some comments: If a “dictator” gained control over an area through force but then passed on rulership to his children when he died do they become monarchs? Because this is the case with nearly all we call “monarchs” today!

    Reply

  5. JebDEB
    January 13, 2016

    Well but those this post take into account “elective monarchies” were the crown wouldn’t necessarily pass from father to son… but from king to elector

    Reply

  6. asfdfd
    August 21, 2016

    Monarches, presidents, dictators are dressed up clowns – shrimps, pieces of smelly Jewish shit. Ancient ones are invented. It’s an attempt to convince modern generation that today’s crypto-Jewish brothel has thousand-year roots. Take into consideration Jewish meanness.
    Real organizers are always hidden. Otherwise they would be killed. Instantly – in no time.
    Jews have been extended maximum for a hundred last years. Languages are Jewish, artificial It’s the tool of a deception, programming. To read, write, speak to look video production harmfully. You become operated.
    Mind, that you are surrounded by dirty crypto-Jews. To stay in the Jewish environment harmfully. You become an idiot.
    There is no other way as to kill Jews always and everywhere successively.

    Reply

    • D3cendant
      September 23, 2020

      You are a moron and a wanna be Arian. Get over yourself. And if you are of Norse decent? Realize how stupid your comment is and grow up.

      Reply

  7. Zahra
    October 19, 2016

    Thank u ….was kind of useful.

    Reply

  8. bob2u
    March 16, 2017

    UK/England Government is an Unitary parliamentary /Constitutional monarchy – not limited.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom

    Reply

  9. Alok
    May 4, 2017

    Thanks, It was useful for me. The difference is appropriate and is understandable.

    Reply

  10. ADITYA PUND
    July 19, 2017

    I have one dout that what is the clear and quite difference between dictatorship and monarchy…….. …thank you
    Please and. This

    Reply

  11. P. BRAHMAWONG
    February 3, 2018

    Many (but not the majority of) kings and emperors in the past were able and benevolent to their respective peoples.

    The Chinese emperors Han Wen Ti, Tang Tai Jong, Kublai Khan, and Kang Xi were among them, as well as a number of Ksatriyas (such as Ashoka of India), Rajs, and Sultans in South and Southeast Asia. Cyrus the Great might be the most famous for Persia but I do not know much about the Middle East. The Occidental examples were plenty also.

    Reply

  12. Raj kumar
    May 21, 2019

    It very easy to understand the situation and important

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top
mobile desktop