2 responses

  1. Clay
    October 5, 2011

    Great article! Easy to understand and spelled out very well!

    Reply

  2. Mr Bond
    May 2, 2021

    A single stage 3 ton furnace at rated 96% efficiency is just as efficient as a two stage 3 ton rated at 96% efficiency, by definition. They both waste 4% by definition, no more, no less. To claim otherwise about the furnace is false, correct?

    Operating cost would be the same. Capital cost would be less for single stage.

    To raise the indoor temperature from one set point to another, a specific amount of heat needs to be transferred. A single stage running 100% pushes out more heat for a shorter period of time, and, a two stage operating at say 80% pushes out less heat for a longer period of time. Once again, by definition of simple math. If the single stage used the same amount of time as a two stage then you would have a case, but it doesn’t so this claim is null.

    Blowing at 80% compared to 100% should be no different in ECM noise for both so noise is really determined by air flow through ductwork. A 20% lower air flow won’t make that much difference on average, because the ductwork is design for 100% on the 2 stage anyway. The owner won’t know the difference unless the two different units were swapped inside his specific home and a decibel meter used to measure the difference so this claim is really disingenuous. If it was 50% or less then one could consider the claim.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top
mobile desktop