Difference Between Similar Terms and Objects

Differences Between a Fawn and a Satyr

Fawn vs Satyr

If you are a fan of mythology, you would have probably come across different and varied mythical creatures.  Usually, Greek mythology presents surprisingly different creatures that are mostly a product of a rambling imagination. Can you imagine that nymphs have different varieties depending on the place where they live? Wood nymphs are in the forest, river nymphs for bodies of water, and there are even air nymphs who occupy the skies.  A lot of other colorful and perplexing characters are present as well. Pegasus, the winged horse that is white and shining is a breed mixed between a unicorn and a stallion. The chimera and the hydra are vile monsters that can wake you up in the middle of the night.

Other characters include fawns and satyrs also. They are precious to the wine god Bacchus because this character loves the forest and everything green and living. And these creatures are some of them. However, you might get confused between the two because there are some literary pieces and articles of other documents that mention them interchangeably.

Satyrs are actually mythical creatures borne out of the ancient Greek culture and literature. They are often described as half man and half goat. If you watch the Disney movie Hercules, the mentor of Hercules is a satyr. So that would give you a better idea of what a satyr looked like. A fawn, on the other hand, has been around during the ancient Roman civilization. They are actually half man and half deer. Of course, both have horns, but their personalities can be quite different. A goat is raunchier, vulgar, crude, and bawdy. They are actually less disagreeable with other people or other creatures, for that matter. A fawn, on the other hand, has more finesse, flair, grace, and poise. They are actually more favored by the Romans.

Fawns, in the original texts, have feet that resemble humans’; however, a satyr has hoofs instead much like a goat’s. Bacchus, the wine god of the Greeks, has been said to be the constant companion of the satyr. Like Bacchus, satyrs are infamously known to have greater and more aggressive drives such as sexual pleasures as compared to that of fawns. Both, however, are seen to be inhabitants of the forests and are both fond of the trees and the wood life in particular.

For the Romans, fawns are seen to be the embodiment of fear especially when traveling or visiting uncharted distant forests. There have been a few accounts of fawn-like encounters, but none have been conclusive or accurate.

A fawn, being a deer, has natural, graceful horns. However, with the satyr, they have to earn it painfully and with much ardor and labor as well. Earning it would mean doing a good deed or being in the favor of the gods.

When you compare looks or the physical appearances, satyrs are less handsome and less good looking than their fawn counterparts. Often fawns are considered to be more gentle and more innocent. They are more lovely and attractive to look at as well. Satyrs are usually portrayed to be a little bit awkward and inept; they are also often described as having too much hair with little eyes, and a huge, voracious mouth. They are also often pictured to be enslaved to gluttony and too much drinking and debauchery as compared to their more sophisticated fawn counterparts.

Fawns are considered to be geniuses, talented, and more knowledgable. Satyrs are usually depicted as someone foolish, gullible, roguish, impish, and ill-behaved.

Some famous movies in Hollywood have also presented and incorporated fawns in blockbuster movies. If you’ve watched The Chronicles of Narnia, a fawn was highlighted there as the friend of the little girl who saw the magical wardrobe. In the movie Percy Jackson and the Lightning Thief, the best friend of the main character is a satyr.


  1. Satyrs are said to be half man and half goat. Meanwhile, fawns are half man and half deer.

  2. Fawns have more grace, poise, and finesse than satyrs.

  3. Satyrs were derived from ancient Greek literature while fawns were from Roman literature.

  4. Satyrs are known to have greater drives than fawns, such as that of sexual pleasures.

  5. Fawns are said to be more intelligent than satyrs.

Sharing is caring!

Search DifferenceBetween.net :

Email This Post Email This Post : If you like this article or our site. Please spread the word. Share it with your friends/family.


  1. That’s f-a-u-n. A “fawn” is an immature deer.

  2. This author posts an amazing volume of inaccurate information. Beware.

    • Deer don’t have horns, they have Antlers, so fauns would have ANTLERS. Satyrs have the horns.

      • Fauns are humans with ears, horns, tail, and legs of a goat. I guess people think that they are deer because of the similarity to the word “fawn”. Satyrs were originally quite different; they were ugly little men with the tail and ears of a horse or donkey. They gained horse legs later on. There is also a huge personality difference. Fauns are joyful and like to play music; Satyrs are rude and perverted and enjoy mischief.

  3. You have several errors in your article. Bacchus is the Roman name for the God of wine, in Greek it is Dionysus. And satyrs are the followers, consorts, and relatives of the Greek god Pan. Pan is the unruly Greek god of shepherds, nature, the wild, and animals therein. Because of Dionysus’ affinity and good rapport with animals he has satyrs in his entourage. Also it is because of the nature of his parties in both the Greek and Roman versions that satyrs are there and partake in the festivities. The Bacchanalia was a Roman holiday that celebrated the Roman God of wine, but it was not unheard of to have sexual debauchery of all kinds in the name of Venus and Faunus (Pan’s Roman name).

Leave a Response

Please note: comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.

Articles on DifferenceBetween.net are general information, and are not intended to substitute for professional advice. The information is "AS IS", "WITH ALL FAULTS". User assumes all risk of use, damage, or injury. You agree that we have no liability for any damages.

See more about : , , ,
Protected by Copyscape Plagiarism Finder