1 response

  1. Albert Krauss
    September 19, 2014

    The syntax in the article is somewhat garbled, obviously written by a “non-native” English speaker/writer. An example would be “… These habits and behaviors can tell the character and the identity of that certain person. These things are very important in the over all attribute of a human person. It can tell whether the person has a positive character or a bad identity.”

    Really? Does the writer mean, perhaps, that describing and/or examining the habits and routines can provide an indication of, or “give clues to”, the character (forget the “identity”!) of that certain person?

    So then, what “things” are important in the “over all attibute(s)” of a person? Presumedly, it would be the character, the behavior, as described by the routines and habits of the person.

    What is a reader, or student, to do with the strange moral judgments required in applying the labels “positive” and “bad”, let alone in defining the terms “character” or “identity”.

    Confusion rules here, for any reader, native or non-native!!

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top
mobile desktop