1 response

  1. Dr. Don Rhudy
    January 12, 2015

    This brief piece makes the mistake of getting caught up in the exoteric Indian terminology of the religion. Basically, an advocate of Buddhism attempts to rid oneself of attachment to the learned and false self and to discover the true and eternal self, although Buddhism does not use those terms. It identifies the cause of individual suffering and lays out the cure for suffering: The Four Noble Truths identify the cause of suffering and prescribe the Eightfold Path to end suffering. Gotama (or Gautama or Shakyamuni) Buddha spoke of God and the Holy Spirit, understood in India as Brahman and Atman, only rarely, pointing out that what is important is inner change of the individual person. Only those who have freed themselves from attachment to self can know Brahman by discovering Atman (or Brahman imminent) in oneself.

    All Buddhists understand that individual beings are “dependent- arising” beings—dependent on good and bad behavior in this and in previous lives (karma) and that many, many lives are necessary for sentient beings to finally free themselves from the attachment to self that is responsible for so much evil in the world. It follows, then, that some Buddhists share the exoteric beliefs that beings that are not sentient, such as dogs, cats, snakes, ants, fleas, etc., may move up in successive lives toward sentience, while very evil sentient beings (Adolph Hitler, for example) may move backward and become animals.

    The distinction between Indian and Tibetan Buddhism is chiefly a distinction between exoteric terms and beliefs that have nothing to do with the Buddhist core practice: to extinguish the self and achieve liberation from it.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top
mobile desktop