4 responses

  1. Sam
    May 16, 2010

    You can use EF-S lenses on the 5DMKII but they will not be cropped, you will need to do it manually on your computer. But everything else will work, it’s the same contact. Thought, your auto focus will be messed up since it will fill and analyze larger part of your image, depending of the lens, so it will not react like on a APS-C body.

    Reply

  2. Kenny Howse
    May 24, 2010

    I’ve just upgraded from an EOS 30D to an EOS 5D Mk II and I must say I’m very impressed with the results so far, just waiting to have my first serious shoot with it!

    Reply

  3. Qwerty
    May 29, 2010

    The D700’s ability to use DX lenses is NOT an advantage, that is absolute nonsense! When you mount a DX lens on the d700, the image is cropped to 5 megapixels which is pretty pathetic. You’d be better off with a proper FX lens. And, being limited to EF lenses is NOT an disadvantage. Canon has a massive selection of EF lenses, ranging from mid-range to high end fast ‘L’ primes and superb telephotos. Nikon also has a large selection of lenses but not as large although they do have the advantage in wide-angle zooms, namely the 14-24. And, the resolution advantage is NOT just useful for printing billboards and inpractical for most users. A picture from the 5d mark ii downsized to 12 megapixels is much SHARPER than a picture from ANY 12 megapixel body. The per pixel sharpness of a 5d mark ii downsized to 12mp is much sharper than the d700. What you ALSO failed to mention is what i feel is the biggest advantage the d700 has over the 5d mark ii, autofocus. The d700 utilises the 51 af point multicam3500fx system, the best in the world and only rivalled by the 1d mark 4. Its the same system used in higher end cameras such as the d3 and absolutely wonderful for continous focus tracking. It just bites on your target and refuses to let go, making the antiquated autofocus used on the 5d mark ii seem like a dog in comparism

    Reply

    • Sam
      May 29, 2010

      I like your tough Qwerty. this comparison was pretty lame considering the rep of the site.

      Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top
mobile desktop