3 responses

  1. YevYev
    February 13, 2016

    I would venture to say that cynicism is a more severe form of scepticism. It is not easy to clearly demarcate one from the other; the two lie on a spectrum in which credulity is on one end, and complete unwillingness to believe is on the other.

    Reply

  2. Safdar
    April 3, 2016

    Conclusively, cynic doubts the motive of the action and skeptic identifies weak aspects of the action with the object to improve it

    Reply

  3. someone
    March 9, 2022

    I will encourage anyone who read this to look up the school of Cynicism by themselves. Both schools are portrayed simplistically, but the account of Cynicism is outright false.

    There is nothing in the concept of Cynicism that says that a Cynic “will not believe evidence that says the problem can be solved” and generally take a negative stance. The most striking difference between the two in judgment is simply that a Cynic might be more doubtful about human motivations.

    Neither is it correct to assume that a Cynic’s stance on knowledge will be wholly determined by their personal beliefs more so than would be the case for anyone else.

    It is also worthwhile to note that some Skeptics do not believe (true) knowledge is attainable at all. There are many many subcategories of Skepticism, however, and the methodological Skepticism described here is far from the only one.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top
mobile desktop