2 responses

  1. Toni
    May 28, 2017

    Please consider:

    The Levant and Persia have intersections of the same places. Iran boundaries did not exist at that time. Pagans (anyone not of the same belief, and all their diverse beliefs) lived dispersed and together. No common religion existed as the vast majority could neither read nor write, and their dialect changed geographically over small areas.

    I believe Zoraster was not a prophet, he was a philosopher. He related social common sense, and related that common sense to the foundations of the Universe as he knew it at that time. People chose to consider him a prophet, which put a spin on the original expressed ideas of Zoraster.

    Zoroastrians loosely relate to a god, but do not live to provide glory to God glorification shows disrespect to God. Thinking and doing anything self-serving before serving everything else is considered disrespectful because we are the care takers of everything provided to us. The written foundation of broad ethical consideration.

    Principles of Zoroastrianism (notice it is a sexist interpretation)

    1) Each Zoroastrian must be good and beneficent in conduct towards all around him.

    2) He cannot injure the interests of any man or living being.

    3) Our speech has to be sweet and beneficial.

    4) Goodness is Godliness and true Zoroastrian should be a ministering angel to all. God is so gracious in providing our needs without any expectation of a reward. So should we radiate goodness every moment of our life.

    5) A Zoroastrian always tries to avoid unnecessary dissensions (Disagreement among those expected to cooperate) as he is asked to be “a bridge over a gulf dividing two sects”, by seeing the underlying unity, inspite of conflicting view points.

    He is a peacemaker and would recognize some truth in every aspect of many-sided arguments.“ To see the other fellow’s viewpoint “ needs great tact.

    6) A Zoroastrian should never force his own opinion on another, as there is freedom of conscience for each one of us. “Forced conversions” are Never successful or long lasting. Zoroaster’s very first sermon (Gatha 30) asks each one of the audience to use his or her “light of reason” and then formulate one’s own belief.

    7) The Zoroastrian doctrine of self sacrifice enjoins all of us to consider the welfare of others before that of our own. We grow by giving and not by acquisitive greed. We are trustees of what we possess and should willingly share our gifts with others. Charity is a special virtue amongst the Parsis, because they think it their duty to improve the lot of those, who are not so fortunate in many directions. ”

    The Torah came about by broad collections of word of mouth, past on from generation to generation. We all know what happens when a story is respoken 5 times, let alone more often and across linguistic boundaries.

    Most people were born, lived, and died withing 20 miles of where they were born. Their dialect was typically common to their local region of 50 miles. A different dialect was spoken every 50 miles throughout the world of humans.

    A dialect interprets understandings and expresses them using different phrases. When passing on stories by word of mouth from dialect to dialect, the understandings change. Back and forth between dialects. The original story obscured by each person’s infliction of their own revelations and subsequent understandings.

    “…the whole of the Torah is comprised of four main sources: J (Yahwist), E (Elohist), D (Deuteronomistic), and P (Priestly). It is most likely that these sources are not texts, but particular groups of individuals who were initially responsible for the composition and transmission of the souces (as oral traditions and/or written compositions) which were later incorporated into the Torah by the P source. Scholars use “source” in a very general way in this context to allow for the ambiguity of what these “sources” were.”

    About 1000 BC the Torah began being transcribed into written works.

    Zoroaster lived during that same time when written works were just beginning to evolve. Again, many generations of word of mouth passed stories from one generation to the next, before fragments embedded in common understandings were put into written works. The vast majority of all written works perished due to the material it was printed upon being worn out, eaten up by fungus and bacteria, and the acids of human hands eating away the stone surfaces from generations of being touched.

    Do not show reverence to any graven image; including texts

    Reply

  2. Robin
    December 7, 2019

    As an iranian jew I found this Very informative, balanced, and a springboard for further reasearch, thank you.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top
mobile desktop