1 response

  1. Roman
    December 14, 2021

    Hi,

    I’ve often seen movie characters make their decisions using Present Continuous at the time of speaking, an example that grammar books traditionally attribute to the Future Simple tense. Why so? Can a life-and-death matter be planned or arranged? I’ve spent some time researching data retrieved from the Corpus of Contemporary American English to find that ‘not leaving without’ is more frequent than ‘not leave without’. Moreover, each example listed refers either to the movie industry or to the media.
    Examples:
    – ‘We need to move! Cops are almost here. I’m not leaving without her!’ (The Gifted, 2019). Does the ‘I won’t leave without her’ or ‘I’m not going to leave without her’ forms make a difference? According to the convention, the Continuous implies a specific time and date for an event (as in ‘We are getting married next month’), which is not the case with an emotional or tense situation like that.
    – ‘That wasn’t discussed with me. Uh, gentlemen, I am not leaving without my elephant.’ (The Simpsons, 1994)
    – ‘No, no, no. Angela, listen to me. I’m not leaving without you. I love you…’ (Heartbreakers, 2001)
    – ‘I guess I showed you guys something about dirty work. Whatever. But we’re not leaving without our 50 grand.’ (Dirty Work, 1998)

    These shades of meaning are hardly ever discussed even in advanced grammar reference books – and I have studied dozens of them – so I would appreciate it if you provide a detailed insight into this aspect of the familiar tenses.

    Best regards,
    Roman
    Murmansk, Russia

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top
mobile desktop