7 responses

  1. MariJewel
    April 21, 2010

    Great article. Good points. Thanks for sharing the difference between a television and a computer monitor.

    Reply

  2. matt
    December 30, 2011

    I still don’t really understand. I knew about resolution differences, but when you compare a similarly-sized LCD monitor with an LCD TV, and hook up a game system to it, or play a movie, it inevitably looks better on the TV (this is at similar or the same resolution and viewing distance).

    It makes me think monitors are tweaked for reading text and TVs for moving visuals. But I don’t understand how this difference works.

    Reply

  3. Robert
    February 7, 2012

    this is what i have found for the reasons. I have done a lot of research in this now and i think this article will be some more help if you want to know the ‘WHY’s”
    “A monitor can output 1920×1080 and is sitting 18 inches from your face. A TV can output 1920×1080 and is sitting 6’6″ from your face.

    Monitors are more costly because they have a higher pixel density and are designed for up-close viewing. A 60” screen with ‘monitor-like’ qualities could easily output imagery with many times more pixels than “HD” quality (likely upwards of 10000×10000 pixels).

    Another feature, although less prominent now, is refresh rate. Monitors typically have higher refresh rates than TVs. Consider that a high-end TV outputs at 120Hz. Most monitors will advertise a 3-5ms response time or about 200-350Hz, which means you get less image ghosting.

    NinjaEdit: Apart from these two things, there is no difference. If you’re okay viewing a 1920×1080 picture stretched across a 60″ screen or viewing at a slightly lower refresh rate then you’re good to go.”

    Hope this helps out.

    Reply

  4. Robert
    February 7, 2012

    A monitor can output 1920×1080 and is sitting 18 inches from your face. A TV can output 1920×1080 and is sitting 6’6″ from your face.

    Monitors are more costly because they have a higher pixel density and are designed for up-close viewing. A 60″ screen with ‘monitor-like’ qualities could easily output imagery with many times more pixels than “HD” quality (likely upwards of 10000×10000 pixels).

    Another feature, although less prominent now, is refresh rate. Monitors typically have higher refresh rates than TVs. Consider that a high-end TV outputs at 120Hz. Most monitors will advertise a 3-5ms response time or about 200-350Hz, which means you get less image ghosting.

    Apart from these two things, there is no difference. If you’re okay viewing a 1920×1080 picture stretched across a 60″ screen or viewing at a slightly lower refresh rate then you’re good to go.

    Reply

  5. J.schelwald
    July 24, 2012

    Thanks very much for the above info. I have a question which is a bit more specific; maybe anyone can help me with it?

    Suppose I have a TV 24″1080p (1920×1080) 5 ms and a monitor 24″ 1080p (1920×1080) 5 ms.
    Can I still expect a difference in image quality when I use the TV as a computer monitor? f.i
    1. When the LCD’s are produced. (For TV and monitor) Are they coming form the same production line? Is there a quality check which filters them to use for one or the other?
    2. Are the electronic circuits directly steering the LCD different? (F.i. one optimized for stability, the other for speed?)
    3. Is the translation logic, which is used to read the signal from the hdmi port identical for TV and monitor? (Again, one build for speed, the other for stability of the image?)

    Reply

  6. Stephanie
    February 10, 2020

    Thanks very much for this enlightening on this topic

    Reply

  7. Gary Kelly
    January 26, 2021

    Can TV’s be used for computer monitors and if they can, what are the instructions to set it up.

    Thank you

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top
mobile desktop