17 responses

  1. Salih Kırcalar
    July 3, 2010

    Dear Dr….,

    Please to visit in my web site ‘ http://www.timeflow.org ‘ And Please can you test my ‘Time Flow’ Formula? Many Thanks.

    Sincerely

    Salih Kırcalar

    Reply

  2. Salih Kırcalar
    July 3, 2010

    Dear Dr….,

    Very small free roaming particles lifetime very short.[free photons, free notron, free proton,free
    electron ,vs].And their lifetime is its energy Mc2. Protons are observed to be stable and their theoretical minimum half-life is 1×10’36 years.Grand unified theories generally predict. That proton
    decay should take place, although experiments so far have only resulted in a lower limit 10’35 years for proton’s lifetime. I see that. The earth lifetime is its Mc’2 energy. When this is calculated
    the lifetime of earth.

    Earth Mass= 5.97×10’24 kg. the lifetime 1 kg of mass in space is 2851927903,26 years.

    Earth Lifetime is 1.7×10’34 years. I think that, this is a very interesting result.

    Best regarts
    Salih Kırcalar

    Reply

  3. Santosh Raj Chetri
    February 17, 2012

    Thank you very much.However request you to elaborate in table form.

    Reply

  4. Amit
    January 2, 2015

    What is the relationship between space time and gravity. And why can’t something go faster than speed if light..

    Reply

  5. Critical Thinker
    January 15, 2016

    “Summary
    1. In special relativity gravity we cannot treat gravity in.”

    What the heck does that mean?

    Reply

  6. hiroji kurihara
    January 9, 2019

    Composition of the vector : Free fall

    Vector of gravity and inertial force is possible to compose. It seems to show that the two are inviolable and non-interference each other (it will be the same on two gravity). It will be the same also on vector of gravity and inertial force that act at an optional point of an elevator cabin in free fall.

    Sorry, I cannot receive E-mail. I do not have PC.

    Reply

  7. hiroji kurihara
    January 26, 2019

    Equivalence Principle

    Let’s start from accelerated motion. Many substances (solids, fluids, etc) are moving in various accelerated motion. According to this motion, inertial force occurs. Imagine water of a current. Involvement between inertial force and gravity will be on resultant force only.《P.S.》Acceleration is not relative and inertial force is not fictitious. The two are corresponding qualitatively and quantitatively.

    Sorry, I cannot receive E-mail. I do not have PC.

    Reply

  8. hiroji kurihara
    February 1, 2019

    Equivalence principle

    Situation setting of free fall requests the existence of inertial force and gravity. Newton’s two laws each guarantees. It is possible that at a point of structure of an elevator, resultant force of the two forces disappears. But it is like a number 777. It will not be the subject of argument.

    Sorry, I cannot receive E-mail. I do not have PC.

    Reply

  9. Hiroji Kurihara
    March 18, 2019

    Gravitational acceleration

    Who started to say gravitational acceleration ? Is it a technical term really ? It seems to be an adjective.

    Is there a difference between an acceleration caused by an ordinal force ? If there is not a difference, a thing called gravitational acceleration will not exist.

    Reply

  10. Hiroji Kurihara
    April 2, 2019

    Turn your eyes to accelerated motion and inertial force. It does not matter what gravity is.

    Reply

  11. Hiroji kurihara
    May 29, 2019

    Free fall

    Are the two indistinguishable? Vector of the two are opposite.

    Reply

  12. Asher Pearce Richardson
    September 8, 2019

    Was the Special Relativity not published in 1905?

    Reply

  13. Hiroji kurihara
    May 18, 2020

    Eddington experiment (on solar eclipce : 1919)

    Eddington experiment is said to find the bending of star light by gravity of the sun. But the additional exam seems not to be done. Surface gravity of the sun is 28.02g and that of Jupiter is 2.53g. Gravity of position apart from each surface (at each radius) is a quater of surface gravity each. Experiment of Jupiter will be possible.

    Reply

  14. Hiroji kuriharax
    May 22, 2020

    Perihelion shift of Mercury (I say again)

    In an binary system (formed by main star and companion star), periapis is shifted also. Motion of companion star (apsidal shift) will be depending considerably on its size (mass is supposed to be the same). Common view (says main cause is pertubation of other planets) will be invalid.

    Reply

  15. Mario Schembri Wismayer
    September 3, 2020

    1905. Not in same year as general theory….

    Reply

  16. Saqib junaid
    December 18, 2021

    Reality o life

    Reply

  17. Hiroji kurihara
    June 2, 2022

    Perihelion Shift of Mercury (repost)

    Size of Sun relative to Mercury will be main cause of this problem (however, will be incompatible with Newton’s spherical shell theorem).

    There are two drawings in which Mercury and gravity source (considered as a point) are drawn. In one drawing, gravity source is Sun and its mass is m. Distance from Mercury is 100. In the other drawing, there are two alternative gravity sources to the sun, Mass is m / 2 each. Distance from Mercury is 99 and 101(aligned on a straight line extending from Mercury). Magnitude of the gravity acting on Mercury is the latter > the former. It can be ignored on Neptune.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top
mobile desktop