17 responses

  1. Opeyemi Nuah
    May 18, 2011

    difference btw seed and grain.

    Reply

    • Ali
      April 25, 2013

      One for production and one for consumption.

      Reply

  2. Jason
    March 20, 2013

    Just to clarify, peanuts are not a grain, they are a legume and related to peas and beans. Other then that you hit the nail on the head. I’d suggest correcting that one incorrect idea that you’ve presented to make your post a great and accurate resource for answering this often asked question.

    Reply

    • Patricia Tursi
      December 31, 2014

      thank you…This is very important and confuses the whole article.

      Reply

  3. Ali
    April 25, 2013

    One for production and one for consumption. Its simple

    Reply

    • Connie
      February 4, 2016

      But it isn’t that simple. For example corn is grown for our consumption. The corn kernels (the grains) are planted for production, for consumption. So doesn’t that make the corn kernel or the wheat, oat, barley, ect. the seed of that plant?

      Reply

  4. Tom
    July 16, 2013

    More confused than ever. It seems the definitions are hazy, and we use an approximation to evaluate what is what. I know what a seed is versus a grain, but I don’t seem to find a technical description. To me a seed and a grain are almost the same thing, but a grain is a human cultivated seed usually from a grass like plant. A seed can refer to something wild or something cultivated. A grain is always something cultivated. Thanks for posting this article though…

    Reply

  5. ken
    August 9, 2013

    as posted above a peanut is a legume, course everybody knows this,except maybe you. i can see no difference between a grain and a seed,for you see both when planted will reproduce in kind. someone said above that grains are always cultivated and this is not so,because once,all of these grains and/ or seeds,grew wild ! so i speculate that there is no difference,except for what people want to refer these things as being !

    Reply

  6. Soni Biehl
    January 24, 2014

    A grain is a seed that comes from a grass.

    Reply

  7. Mark
    February 1, 2014

    I agree with Tom and Ken, in practical terms I cannot see a difference other than maybe what Soni Biehl referred to.

    When planted both reproduce the original so why call it
    ‘grain’ instead of ‘seed’?
    Actually come to think of it we have what we call ‘seed grain’ kept for next year’s crop, just to confuse the issue further

    Reply

  8. TheManFromTaco
    July 7, 2015

    The main difference is….

    Seeds are considered OK by paleo diet fans, while grains are vilified as an evil curse that will make you fat, sick and bloated for life.

    Reply

    • Kj
      August 14, 2016

      Exactly.

      Reply

    • A-OK
      February 7, 2018

      The article clearly states that grains are essentially a type of fruit: “A grain is a small edible fruit”. In that case, I would like to know why the Paleo diet abhors grains and recommends fruit. Just because grains are smaller than other fruit? Not a terribly convincing argument.

      Reply

  9. Deborah
    October 12, 2016

    Well, there is this:
    “HIERACHY: “Seed” is the most basic term, the other terms are characterizations of seeds. However, the use of any given term in a culinary settings may have little to do with the term’s strict botanical definition. For culinary purposes there are no definite rules for which things are called nuts, pits, beans, grains, etc.

    For example, the term beans used to be exclusively used for broad beans (fava beans), but today we use the term to describe plants as biologically and geographically disparate as soy, garbanzo, coffee, legumes, castor, and cocoa.

    Kernel does not only refer to the center part of a nut. It is also regularly used to refer to the individual seeds of corn/maize, wheat, buckwheat, and barley.

    Grains used to refer specifically to the seeds of grass food crops like wheat, barley, oats, and corn/maize. Today it is also a catch-all term which is used for similar food crops that are not grass seeds such as amaranth, millet, quinoa, rice, buckwheat, and even soy.

    As a culinary term, “nut” has also undergone an expansion of meaning from, as you put it, “a fruit composed of a hard shell and a seed, which is generally edible” to include basically any relatively large, oily kernels found within a shell and used in food. In fact, the majority of the “nuts” we commonly eat are not true nuts.”

    And then this:

    “Millet, quinoa, amaranth and buckwheat are described as grains, but while they are indeed granular, they are in fact seeds. The difference? I consulted my friendly agronomist, who explained that very broadly, grains contain a food source as well as the necessaries for germination. Seeds are embryonic plants.”

    Reply

  10. Nirupama
    May 13, 2019

    It is very nice defined. Thanks for the answer

    Reply

  11. shravan Rajesh Rathod
    August 29, 2020

    Sir i am kabaddi plyer

    Reply

  12. Ray
    September 28, 2021

    I’m glad I’m not the only one! I was still confused as heck after reading this explanation. But it was actually informative, so I give props for that. And now I actually DO know the difference. I agree with others that there basically is NO difference, technically, between the two, other than purpose. Grains are basically fruit with seed fused together, from grasses, cultivated for food primarily, But you can plant grains such as rice, which are fused with their seed, for cultivation. And seeds are just the actual seeds of fruits from non-grass plants. I think?

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top
mobile desktop