Difference Between Similar Terms and Objects

Difference Between Lutheran and Presbyterian

Lutheran vs. Presbyterian

Many have taken interest on how a religion differs from one another. Here you can see some comparisons on how Lutheran is different from Presbyterian.

For the Lutherans, they believe that when Jesus died on the cross it was for the forgiveness of all the people’s sins. It is for the people who have faith in Him, people who will have faith in Him, and as well as those who do not and will never have faith in Christ and that they will be in hell for eternity. They teach about God’s unconditional love and unselfishness that He sent His Son to love and save the people of the world, even those who do not deserve His love. But for some of the Presbyterian Churches, they teach their members that the sacrifices Jesus did on that cross were limited. They say that His death on that cross was only for the sins of those who are chosen. People who are destined to believe and have faith in Christ for eternity will be the only ones who will spend their eternity in Heaven with Him. The rest, the ones who are not chosen will not be cleansed.

Their belief about predestination is also different. Lutherans believe that God has chosen whom to save and spent their eternity with him and they are the ones who have trust and faith in Him in Jesus Christ’s grace. They also believe that anyone who will be in damnation was not predestined by God. He did not choose anyone to be there; they are damned not because God wanted them to be but because of their own sins. The Presbyterian thinks differently about this. They teach in their churches about the “double predestination”. They say God predestined everyone’s rightful place regardless of faith. Some people are to be saved eternally with Him and some are destined to damned. Man can do nothing to save himself from eternal damnation.

Both religions consult the Bible for their teaching and beliefs. The Lutherans believe that the way to interpreting and understanding the Holy Bible is through the Gospel. They believe that it is the heart of the Scripture. They believe it is the sole rule of the Christian doctrine. The Presbyterian, on the other hand, emphasizes that the central teaching of the Scripture is the glory and sovereignty of God.

A simple dissimilarity of the two is that the Lutherans think accepting communions means you are really accepting the real body of Christ while the Presbyterian says it’s just a symbol of the body and blood of Christ. The Lutheran relies on their Christian doctrines on the Scriptures alone and doesn’t acknowledge the human reasons. Presbyterians however, believe that the Scriptures and the human reasons work together. They don’t just base their source of doctrinal authority to the scriptures but allow human reasons to intervene with it.
They also view the sacraments differently. For the Lutherans, Baptism and the Lord’s Last Supper were actual means of the grace of God. While the Presbyterian sees it more of a mere symbol of His grace.

1. Jesus died on that cross for everybody, says the Lutherans. The Presbyterians think it’s just for those who are chosen.
2. Lutherans say, have and faith and believe in God and you shall be saved. For the Presbyterians, God already chose whom to save and whom to be damned.
3. For the Lutherans, the sole rule of the Christian doctrine is the Gospel. The Presbyterian believes that it’s the glory and sovereignty of God.
4. The Lutheran believes that the communion is the actual body and blood of Christ; however, the Presbyterian believes it’s just the symbols of God’s body and blood.
5. Scriptures, for the Lutherans, are the only source of doctrines. Presbyterian on the other hand, thinks that beside the Scriptures, human reasons should be a basis as well.
6. The Baptism and Lord’s Supper are the actual means of God’s grace according to the Lutherans. But to the Presbyterians, they are just symbols of His grace.

Search DifferenceBetween.net :

Custom Search

Help us improve. Rate this post! 1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (12 votes, average: 2.08 out of 5)

Email This Post Email This Post : If you like this article or our site. Please spread the word. Share it with your friends/family.


  1. Oh my — this article contains so many misunderstandings about Presbyterianism that I don’t know where to start! I am a pastor in the PC(USA) church, and this was shared with me by a Lutheran considering joining our church. Fortunately, I was able to explain to him that points 1-4 are completely wrong, 5 seems to have Presbyterians confused with Methodism, and only #6 is somewhat accurate (Baptism and the Lord’s Supper aren’t “just” symbols of grace, but they are visible symbols of what God has already done/of God’s grace).

    A better source for information on Presbyterianism would be to read Christian Doctrine by Shirley Gutherie.

    • Amen to that Amy, there are so many things here that were written that were incorrect. Hoping the author corrects this.

  2. Yeah, make sure you clarify which Lutherans you are talking about because that is not completely correct for what ELCA Lutherans believe.

  3. I think that this summary is extremely simplistic, it is not a correct presentation of what Presbyterians believe, which makes me wonder if it is a correct presentation of what Lutherans believe. The title itself Lutherans vs. Presbyterians tells me that perhaps there was supposed to be a winner here. In love let us be accurate about what we post. In Christ, Rev. Hector Reynoso

    • You right! Instead of talking the differences why dont we look at the similarity between all the denomination. Lets God take care of these. How did this happened

  4. I have spent my entire life in the Presbyterian Church (USA) and recognize little that the author has to say about us. The article seems to be based entirely on rumor and speculation, particularly on the subject of predestination. I detect a sense of contempt for the Presbyterian Church that is based on disinformation.

    If you want the real story on the Presbyterian Church (USA) I suggest you do some reading at “Presbyterian 101” at http://www.presbyterianmission.org/ministries/101/

    I would be like to know who wrote this, so that I can avoid this author in the future.

  5. OMG this is so wrong! Lutherans do not believe in predestination in that way at all! we do not believe there are certain people predestined for heaven! Everyone’s allowed in and accepted!…

  6. If we receive the testimony of men, the testimony of God is greater; for the testimony of God is this, that He has testified concerning His Son. The one who believes in the Son of God has the testimony in himself; the one who does not believe God has made Him a liar, because he has not believed in the testimony that God has given concerning His Son. And the testimony is this, that God has given us eternal life, and this life is in His Son.…

    John 3:18
    Whoever believes in him is not condemned, but whoever does not believe stands condemned already because they have not believed in the name of God’s one and only Son.

    The simplicity in Christ and Christ crucified. The rest is the work of God, for the work of God is this, ” Therefore they said to Him, “What shall we do, so that we may work the works of God?” Jesus answered and said to them, “This is the work of God, that you believe in Him whom He has sent.” So they said to Him, “What then do You do for a sign, so that we may see, and believe You? What work do You perform?…

    John 3:17
    For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him.

  7. Whoever contributed to this series of articles knows very little about the comparison of Christian religions.

  8. I wanted to learn a bit about Presbyterian beliefs but don’t think this article is helpful because I know some of the “facts” about Lutherans aren’t true. Every Lutheran I’ve ever met (so everyone at my church) would laugh at the thought of communion being the literal body and blood of Jesus. Plus how can you make a broad statement for all Lutherans when the ELCA and MO Synod are basically different denominations? This definitely is not helpful.

    • John, you don’t mention what exactly your fellow Lutherans do believe. From what I can see, the difference is that while Christ is mysteriously present in the bread and the wine, He is not actually eaten. And yet it is not Christs’ spirit that is present or perhaps better put, the Holy Spirit, but Christ himself. That Christ appears without appearing.

      from a few Wiki pages re the Eucharist…

      Lutherans maintain that what they believe to be the biblical doctrine of the manducatio indignorum (“eating of the unworthy”) supports this doctrine as well as any other doctrine affirming the Real Presence. The manducatio indignorum is the contention that even unbelievers eating and drinking in the Eucharist really eat and drink the body and blood of Christ.

      This view was put forward by Martin Luther in his 1528 Confession Concerning Christ’s Supper:
      (the following quotes Luther I understand…)
      { Why then should we not much more say in the Supper, “This is my body,” even though bread and body are two distinct substances, and the word “this” indicates the bread? Here, too, out of two kinds of objects a union has taken place, which I shall call a “sacramental union,” because Christ’s body and the bread are given to us as a sacrament. This is not a natural or personal union, as is the case with God and Christ. It is also perhaps a different union from that which the dove has with the Holy Spirit, and the flame with the angel, but it is also assuredly a sacramental union.}

      [Manducatio impiorum (“eating by the impious”) or manducatio indignorum (“eating by the unworthy”) is the view, held by Martin Luther and Philipp Melanchthon, but denied by Huldrych Zwingli and John Calvin, that even unbelievers who eat and drink the Eucharist eat and drink the body and blood of Christ. It relates to doctrine of the real presence of Christ in the Eucharist…]

      [Sacramental union is the Lutheran theological doctrine of the Real Presence of the body and blood of Christ in the Christian Eucharist.]

      I’m still confused about how this is biblical. Sounds more like Gnostic secret knowledge than anything Jesus actually taught.

      • Saint Paul taught that everyone who partakes of the Lord’s Supper literally eats the Body and Blood of Jesus. See 1 Corinthians 11:27-31 “Whoever, therefore, eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner will be guilty concerning the body and blood of the Lord. Let a person examine himself, then, and so eat of the bread and drink of the cup. For anyone who eats and drinks without discerning the body eats and drinks judgment on himself. That is why many of you are weak and ill, and some have died. But if we judged ourselves truly, we would not be judged.”

        Here, Paul portrays the Body and Blood of Christ as objective realities, independent of the belief or faith of any person who partakes of it. Consequently, an unbeliever takes it to his judgement. If the Lord’s Supper were not an objective thing, the unbeliever wouldn’t encounter it at all.
        Also Jesus, in John 6 says, “For my body is real food, and my blood is real drink.” What more could one say to describe that something is real than to say, “this is real”?

        • Pastor Spomer, great words and quotes from Scripture. This is why the Presbyterian faith has put so much emphasis on not to partake in an unworthy manner. We were taught this even before being confirmed when we went thru the

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Westminster_Shorter_Catechism and the longer catechism as well.

          But although we in the Presbyterian faith believe in the Real presence in the bread and wine…we do not believe in transubstantiation nor the belief that the Lutherans have in consubstantiation.

          Although I completely agree with you on the scripture you quoted this does not negate the real presence” as taught in the Presbyterian faith with regards to the Lord being present in the elements in a spiritual way.

Leave a Response

Please note: comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.

Articles on DifferenceBetween.net are general information, and are not intended to substitute for professional advice. The information is "AS IS", "WITH ALL FAULTS". User assumes all risk of use, damage, or injury. You agree that we have no liability for any damages.

See more about : ,
Protected by Copyscape Plagiarism Finder