Difference Between Similar Terms and Objects

Difference Between Flammable and Inflammable

200px-flammable-symbolsvgFlammable vs Inflammable

Flammability is described as how easily something gets burned or ignited. Fire, or combustion, is the result. Due to the implication of fire hazards, many establishments implement the use of building and fire codes to closely monitor, and or, properly manage emergencies related to fire. This, however, brings about the birth of popular terms, such as flammable and inflammable.

Today, many people are still asking about the difference between these two words that describe flammability, or combustion. Surprisingly, these two words mean exactly the same thing. Yes, flammable and inflammable are similar. Both terms denote that something is combustible, or that it can be ignited. However, many people get carried away with the prefix ‘in’, and that’s why they mistakenly define ‘inflammable’, as the opposite of flammable.

You may have noticed, certain trucks, that carry liquids that can be burned, such as ethanol, acetone and gasoline, are all marked with warning labels bearing the term flammable instead of inflammable. This is because, the use of the latter is rather odd, and it only makes the confusion worse. To the ones who will have the chance to gaze upon the marks of these trucks, and are the bystanders or any person nearby, the simple usage of the term flammable is rather more acceptable, although, using inflammable is really the more appropriate term. The reason for this, is that inflammable is derived from a Latin word that literally means ‘to set fire to.’ Instead of the usual meaning of the prefix ‘in’ (the opposite, a negation), this word uses the said prefix to mean ‘inside.’ To further clarify things, those items or objects, that cannot be burned or ignited, are said to be non-flammable, and not inflammable.

The main difference is just seen in the spelling, wherein the latter has the prefix ‘in’. This prefix causes the confusion, because the use of this prefix has always been attributed to mean a negation of the root word. For example, when you pertain to stability as the state of being stable, instability is the exact opposite, negating the root word stable by applying the prefix ‘in’ before the word.

Overall:

1. Inflammable and flammable are terms that mean the same to describe objects or items that can be burned, or ignited. However, the latter is more acceptable, and more comfortably used by many, to minimize confusion, whereas the first term is the more appropriate term based on its original Latin form.

2. Inflammable is an older term compared to flammable. The term flammable was just recently devised to avoid confusion amongst the public.


Search DifferenceBetween.net :

Custom Search



1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (5 votes, average: 3.40 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...


Email This Post Email This Post : If you like this article or our site. Please spread the word. Share it with your friends/family.



See more about : ,

Leave a Response

Please note: comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.

Articles on DifferenceBetween.net are general information, and are not intended to substitute for professional advice. The information is "AS IS", "WITH ALL FAULTS". User assumes all risk of use, damage, or injury. You agree that we have no liability for any damages.


Protected by Copyscape Plagiarism Finder